Is Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CHP.UN) a worthy addition to your portfolio? This report, updated January 13, 2026, provides a deep dive into its business moat, financial strength, and fair value. We benchmark its performance against key competitors like RioCan and SmartCentres, presenting key takeaways through the lens of Warren Buffett's investment principles.
The outlook for Choice Properties REIT is mixed. Its primary strength is a defensive portfolio of necessity-based retail properties anchored by Loblaw. This relationship provides highly stable and predictable cash flows. The company generates strong margins, and its dividend is very well-covered and secure. However, a significant concern is the high level of debt on its balance sheet. Future growth will depend on the successful execution of its development pipeline. The stock currently appears to be fairly valued, suiting income investors comfortable with high leverage.
CAN: TSX
Choice Properties REIT operates a straightforward and powerful business model: it owns, manages, and develops a high-quality portfolio of commercial real estate across Canada. At its core, the company functions as a landlord, generating income by leasing its properties to a variety of tenants. The foundation of its business and its most significant revenue driver is its vast portfolio of retail properties. These are not just any retail centers; they are predominantly open-air plazas anchored by necessity-based retailers, meaning stores that consumers visit regularly for essential goods, such as supermarkets and pharmacies. This focus makes the business highly defensive. Beyond its retail core, Choice Properties has been strategically diversifying its portfolio by developing and acquiring industrial and mixed-use residential properties, leveraging its extensive land bank in prime urban locations to fuel future growth and enhance value.
The primary service offered by Choice Properties is the leasing of its retail real estate, which accounts for the vast majority of its revenue, typically contributing over 80% of its Net Operating Income (NOI). This segment is defined by its strategic relationship with Loblaw Companies Limited, which, along with its various banners like Loblaws, No Frills, and Shoppers Drug Mart, serves as the anchor tenant for a significant portion of the portfolio. The Canadian retail real estate market is mature and competitive, with a market size in the hundreds of billions. The sub-segment of necessity-anchored retail, however, offers greater stability and grows steadily with population and inflation, typically seeing low single-digit annual growth. Profit margins, measured by NOI margin, are robust in this sector, often ranging from 65% to 75%. Key competitors include other major Canadian REITs like RioCan REIT, which has a more diversified tenant base in major urban centers, and SmartCentres REIT, which has a similar anchor-focused strategy with Walmart. Choice Properties' key advantage over these peers is the unparalleled depth of its relationship with its primary tenant, Loblaw, which is not just a tenant but also a significant unitholder, creating a powerful alignment of interests. The direct consumers of this service are the retail tenants themselves, from the massive Loblaw corporation to smaller national chains and local businesses that benefit from the high foot traffic generated by the grocery anchor. The stickiness of these tenants is very high; retail leases are typically long-term, often spanning 5 to 15 years, and the capital investment and customer base associated with a physical location make relocation costly and disruptive. The competitive moat for this retail segment is exceptionally strong, derived directly from this symbiotic relationship with an investment-grade anchor tenant. This ensures a stable, predictable, and growing stream of rental income that is largely insulated from economic cycles, a feature many competitors cannot fully replicate.
A secondary and rapidly growing segment for Choice Properties is its industrial portfolio, which now contributes roughly 10-15% of its NOI. The 'product' here is the leasing of modern logistics and distribution facilities, which are critical infrastructure for the modern economy, particularly for e-commerce and supply chain management. The Canadian industrial real estate market has experienced a massive boom, with the market size expanding significantly and seeing double-digit compound annual growth rates (CAGR) in rental rates in recent years. This sector is highly competitive, featuring specialized players like Granite REIT and Dream Industrial REIT. While Choice Properties is a smaller player compared to these pure-play industrial giants, its competitive edge comes from its integrated strategy. Many of its industrial developments are built on surplus land adjacent to its existing retail properties. The 'consumers' are large-scale tenants in logistics, manufacturing, and retail who require sophisticated distribution centers. Tenant stickiness is extremely high due to the specialized build-outs and the critical role these facilities play in a company's operations. The moat in this segment is not scale, but rather its valuable and well-located land bank. By developing on land it already owns, Choice Properties has a significant cost and location advantage, allowing it to build state-of-the-art facilities in dense urban areas where land is scarce and expensive. This development pipeline is a key differentiator and a powerful engine for future income growth.
Finally, the company's long-term strategy includes the development of mixed-use properties, incorporating residential and office components into its existing retail sites. This segment is still emerging, contributing less than 5% of current NOI, but represents a significant long-term value creation opportunity. The 'product' is the creation of integrated communities where people can live, work, shop, and play. The market for multi-family residential properties in Canada's major cities is exceptionally strong, driven by housing shortages and immigration, while the office market is more nuanced, favoring modern, well-located buildings with high-quality amenities. Choice Properties competes with specialized residential REITs like CAPREIT and office REITs, but its unique position is its ability to build these properties on its existing land, creating built-in synergies with its retail centers. The primary 'consumers' are apartment renters and office tenants who are attracted to the convenience and amenities of a mixed-use environment. The competitive moat, similar to its industrial segment, is its irreplaceable land bank. This allows for densification—the process of adding more value and leasable area to a single piece of land—in prime locations without having to compete in the expensive urban land market. This ability to transform its existing assets into higher-and-better uses is a powerful, long-term competitive advantage that will drive value for decades. In conclusion, Choice Properties' business model is built on an incredibly stable retail foundation, fortified by its unique Loblaw partnership. This core business generates predictable cash flow that funds strategic expansion into high-growth industrial and residential sectors, all powered by a land bank that serves as a deep and durable competitive moat.
From a quick health check, Choice Properties is currently profitable from an operational standpoint, generating 1.01B in operating income over the last twelve months. It is also generating real cash, with 724.7M in cash flow from operations over the same period, which supports its activities. However, the balance sheet is not entirely safe, carrying a large debt load of 12.7B against a small cash balance of 35M in the most recent quarter. Near-term stress is visible in the volatile net income, which swung from a loss of -154.25M in Q2 2025 to a gain of 242.65M in Q3 2025, largely due to non-cash accounting adjustments on property values.
The income statement reveals strong underlying profitability. Total revenue for the last twelve months was 1.50B, and it has shown modest growth, up 4.89% year-over-year in the latest quarter. The standout feature is the company's high operating margin, which was 68.78% for the full year and remained strong at 70.24% in the most recent quarter. This indicates excellent pricing power and cost control over its rental properties. While reported net income is volatile due to changes in property valuations, the stable and high operating income provides a clearer picture of the core business's health, suggesting the property portfolio is performing well.
To check if these earnings are real, we look at cash flow. Annually, cash from operations (CFO) of 724.7M is reasonably close to the net income of 784.4M, confirming that profits are largely backed by cash. In quarters where net income was volatile, like the Q2 2025 loss of -154.25M, CFO remained positive and strong at 160.04M. This mismatch was mainly because the net income loss was driven by non-cash items like asset writedowns, which don't affect the actual cash generated. Therefore, investors can have confidence that the company's core operations are consistently generating cash, even when accounting profits fluctuate.
The balance sheet requires careful monitoring and is on a watchlist. The primary concern is the high leverage. As of the latest quarter, total debt stands at 12.7B, a significant figure compared to the total equity of 4.7B. This results in a Debt-to-Equity ratio of 2.7, which is high even for a capital-intensive industry like real estate. Liquidity is also tight, with only 35M in cash and a quick ratio of 0.34, indicating limited ability to cover short-term liabilities without selling assets. While REITs typically use debt to grow, Choice Properties' high leverage makes it more vulnerable to rising interest rates, which could increase borrowing costs and pressure cash flows.
The company's cash flow engine appears dependable for funding its core needs. Operating cash flow has been stable in the last two quarters, coming in at 160.04M and 165.81M, respectively. A portion of this cash is used for capital expenditures, including 49.8M on property acquisitions in the most recent quarter, suggesting ongoing investment in its portfolio. The remaining cash flow is primarily directed toward paying dividends. The steady generation of cash from its properties is the primary strength that allows the company to manage its obligations and reward shareholders, though there isn't much excess cash left over after investments and dividends.
From a shareholder perspective, the monthly dividend is a key attraction and appears sustainable for now. The company paid 0.758 per share in dividends over the last year, which was covered comfortably by its funds from operations (FFO), resulting in a healthy FFO payout ratio of 33.26%. This low payout ratio provides a significant cushion. There has been no significant share buyback activity; instead, the share count has slightly increased, leading to minor dilution for existing unitholders. The company is primarily using its cash to fund property investments and pay dividends, while also taking on more debt to support this strategy. This allocation is viable as long as property income remains strong, but the reliance on debt is a risk.
In summary, the key strengths of Choice Properties are its high and stable operating margins of nearly 70% and its strong dividend coverage, with a conservative FFO payout ratio of around 33%. These factors point to a well-managed, profitable property portfolio. However, the primary red flag is the highly leveraged balance sheet, with a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio of 11.83 and a Debt-to-Equity ratio of 2.7. This high debt level, combined with a low cash balance, creates financial risk. Overall, the financial foundation looks stable from an operational perspective, but risky from a balance sheet perspective, making it a mixed picture for investors.
Over the past five years (FY2020-FY2024), Choice Properties has delivered a consistent, albeit modest, performance. The company's total revenue grew at an average annual rate of about 2.7%. However, momentum has picked up recently, with the three-year average growth rate (FY2022-FY2024) accelerating to approximately 4.9%. This suggests an improvement in underlying rental income and property performance. A more important metric for REITs, Funds From Operations (FFO), which adds back non-cash charges like depreciation to net income, has shown similarly stable growth. FFO grew at a five-year average rate of 3.5% and a three-year average rate of 3.45%, indicating a very steady and predictable core business.
The latest fiscal year (FY2024) continues this trend of stability, with revenue growing 2.82% and FFO increasing by about 2.8% over the prior year. This consistency is a hallmark of the REIT's operating model, which focuses on tenants that are less sensitive to economic downturns, such as grocery stores and pharmacies. While the growth is not spectacular, its predictability provides a solid foundation for the company's reliable dividend payments, which is a primary attraction for many REIT investors.
From an income statement perspective, Choice Properties' performance has been remarkably stable. Total revenue has methodically increased from $1.32 billion in 2020 to $1.47 billion in 2024. More impressively, operating income, a measure of core profitability, grew from $890 million to over $1.01 billion in the same period, with operating margins consistently holding strong in the 67-69% range. This high level of profitability is a significant strength. It is important for investors to look past the volatile net income figures, which swung from a profit of $744 million in 2022 to a small profit of $23 million in 2021. This volatility is mainly due to non-cash accounting adjustments related to the fair value of its properties, a common feature for REITs. Focusing on Funds From Operations (FFO) provides a clearer picture, showing a steady climb from $652 million in 2020 to $747 million in 2024.
An analysis of the balance sheet reveals a story of high but managed leverage. Total debt has remained elevated, hovering between $11.6 billion and $12.4 billion over the last five years. While the absolute debt level is high, the company has shown discipline by growing its asset base and equity, preventing leverage ratios from spiraling. For instance, the debt-to-equity ratio has improved from a high of 3.7x in 2021 to a more manageable 2.44x in 2024. Total assets have grown from $15.6 billion to $17.6 billion over the five-year period, providing a larger base to support the debt. The key risk signal is that this high debt load makes the company sensitive to changes in interest rates, as refinancing debt at higher rates could pressure cash flows. The balance sheet appears stable, but its high leverage warrants caution.
The company's cash flow performance underscores its operational reliability. Choice Properties has consistently generated strong positive cash flow from operations (CFO), which ranged from $621 million to $725 million over the past five years. This consistency is the engine that powers its dividends and reinvestment activities. As expected for a growing REIT, cash flow from investing has been consistently negative, primarily due to the acquisition of new properties, with hundreds of millions spent annually on expanding the portfolio. The reliability of its operating cash flow demonstrates the durability of its tenant base and the essential nature of its retail centers.
Choice Properties has a clear track record of returning capital to shareholders through dividends. The annual dividend per share has seen modest but steady increases, rising from $0.74 in 2020 to $0.758 in 2024. Total common dividends paid to shareholders have correspondingly risen from $235 million to $248 million over the same period. The dividend has been very stable, with no cuts and small, incremental raises. On the share count front, the company has maintained discipline. The number of diluted shares outstanding has been virtually flat, moving from 327 million in 2020 to 328 million in 2024. This indicates that the company has avoided significant shareholder dilution to fund its operations or growth.
From a shareholder's perspective, this capital allocation strategy appears prudent and effective. The minimal increase in share count means that growth in the business translates directly to per-share metrics. FFO per share, a key valuation metric, has improved from $0.92 in 2020 to $1.03 in 2024, confirming that shareholders are benefiting from the company's performance. The dividend is exceptionally affordable and sustainable. In 2024, the $248 million in dividends paid was covered nearly three times over by the $725 million in cash from operations. Furthermore, the FFO payout ratio of 33.26% is very conservative for a REIT, suggesting a high margin of safety and the capacity for future dividend increases or reinvestment without straining financial resources. This combination of a stable share count and a well-covered dividend makes the capital allocation strategy look very shareholder-friendly.
In conclusion, the historical record for Choice Properties supports confidence in the company's execution and resilience. Its performance has been characterized by steady, incremental growth rather than volatile swings. The single biggest historical strength has been the consistent and predictable cash flow generated from its high-quality, necessity-focused retail portfolio. This has allowed it to pay a reliable and slowly growing dividend. The most significant historical weakness is its perpetually high leverage, which introduces financial risk, particularly in a rising interest rate environment. For investors, the past five years paint a picture of a stable, income-generating machine that prioritizes consistency over rapid growth.
The Canadian real estate industry, particularly for REITs, is undergoing a significant transformation that will define growth over the next 3-5 years. The most profound shift is the bifurcation of retail real estate. Demand is polarizing, with strong growth in necessity-anchored, open-air centers that facilitate omnichannel strategies (like buy-online-pickup-in-store), while traditional enclosed malls face headwinds. This trend is driven by the durable growth of e-commerce, which paradoxically reinforces the value of well-located physical stores as fulfillment hubs and points of customer interaction. Concurrently, the logistics and industrial real estate sector is experiencing a secular tailwind, fueled by the same e-commerce boom and a push towards supply chain resiliency. The Canadian industrial market is projected to see continued strong rental growth, with some estimates putting the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for net effective rents in major markets like Toronto and Vancouver between 5% and 8% through 2027, even after a period of historic increases. A third major trend is densification, driven by demographic shifts, including Canada's ambitious immigration targets aiming for approximately 500,000 new permanent residents annually. This population growth, concentrated in major urban centers, is exacerbating an already acute housing shortage and creating immense demand for new multi-family residential properties, especially rental units.
Catalysts for demand in the coming years are clear. For retail, it will be population growth and the continued focus of consumers on value and convenience, which benefits grocery-anchored centers. For industrial, the catalysts are the ongoing adoption of e-commerce, which still has room to grow as a percentage of total retail sales, and companies' needs to modernize their supply chains. For residential, the primary catalyst is the persistent imbalance between supply and demand in major cities. The competitive intensity varies by sector. In prime retail and industrial, the barrier to entry is extraordinarily high due to the scarcity and cost of land, giving large, well-capitalized incumbents like Choice Properties a significant advantage. The development space is more fragmented and competitive, but owning the land is a crucial differentiator. The number of publicly traded REITs has been relatively stable, but consolidation could increase as scale becomes more important for accessing capital and operating efficiently. The future belongs to REITs that can adapt, either by owning the most resilient assets or by creating new value through development on irreplaceable land, positioning Choice Properties to leverage its core strengths.
As of 2026-01-13, with a closing price of C$14.99, Choice Properties Real Estate Investment Trust (CHP.UN) commands a market capitalization of approximately C$10.8 billion. The units are currently trading near the top of their 52-week range of C$12.51 to C$15.45, indicating positive recent market sentiment. For a retail REIT like Choice Properties, the most critical valuation metrics are based on cash flow and dividends, not traditional earnings. The key numbers to watch are the Price/Funds from Operations (P/FFO), currently around 14.6x based on trailing twelve months (TTM) FFO of $1.03 per unit, the attractive dividend yield of 5.1%, and the EV/EBITDA multiple, which stands at a high 17.5x. Prior analysis has highlighted that the REIT's cash flows are exceptionally stable due to its relationship with Loblaw, which justifies a steady, predictable valuation. However, the same analysis pointed to high debt levels, which explains why the market is not awarding it a higher, premium multiple.
The professional analyst community sees limited, but positive, upside from the current price. The 12-month price targets for CHP.UN range from a low of C$15.50 to a high of C$18.38, with a median of C$16.17, implying an upside of approximately 7.9%. This narrow target dispersion suggests analysts share a similar view of stability rather than high growth. While analyst targets provide a useful sentiment check, they can be flawed; in this case, the consensus 'Hold' or 'Buy' ratings align with the narrative of a stable, income-producing vehicle with limited capital appreciation potential.
A simplified intrinsic value calculation using a variation of the dividend discount model (substituting FFO for dividends) suggests a fair value range of $19.00–$21.00. This method, which focuses purely on cash-generating power, implies the stock might be undervalued. However, this model is highly sensitive to inputs like growth (assumed at 2.5%) and discount rates (7.0%-8.0%) and may not fully capture the market's discount for high leverage and tenant concentration. Other valuation methods provide a more grounded view. A yield-based approach, assuming a required FFO yield of 6.5%–7.5%, produces a fair value range of C$13.73–C$15.85. The current price of C$14.99 falls squarely in this range, suggesting the market is pricing the REIT's yield fairly.
Looking at historical and peer multiples, CHP.UN's current P/FFO of 14.6x is at the higher end of its recent historical average (12.0x-14.0x), suggesting it is not cheap relative to its own past. Furthermore, it trades at a notable premium to its closest peers like RioCan REIT (10.1x P/FFO) and SmartCentres REIT (~11.7x P/FFO). While this premium is justified by its exceptionally stable cash flow from Loblaw, it is substantial. Triangulating these different valuation signals—giving more weight to the realistic yield and multiples-based approaches—leads to a final fair value range of C$14.00–C$16.00, with a midpoint of C$15.00. With the current price at C$14.99, the final verdict is that the stock is fairly valued.
Warren Buffett would view Choice Properties as an understandable and high-quality business, akin to owning a collection of toll bridges for essential goods. The REIT's primary appeal is its durable moat, stemming from its strategic relationship with Loblaw, which ensures highly predictable cash flows, best-in-class occupancy of over 97%, and long-term leases. However, Buffett would be highly cautious of the extreme tenant concentration, with over 50% of revenue coming from a single source, which violates his principle of diversification. While the balance sheet is acceptable, with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio around 7.1x, it is not as pristine as best-in-class US peers. In 2025, with a Price-to-AFFO multiple in the 14x-17x range, the stock offers stability at a fair price, but lacks the significant margin of safety Buffett demands to compensate for the concentration risk. If forced to choose the best retail REITs, Buffett would likely favor US-based Regency Centers (REG) and Kimco Realty (KIM) for their fortress balance sheets (leverage around 5.5x) and superior tenant diversification, or SmartCentres (SRU.UN) in Canada for its lower concentration (~25% from Walmart) and stronger balance sheet. For retail investors, the key takeaway is that while CHP.UN is a very safe and stable business, Buffett would likely avoid it at current prices due to the lack of a discount and the high concentration. Buffett would likely only consider an investment after a 20-25% price decline to create an adequate margin of safety.
Charlie Munger would view Choice Properties as a simple, understandable business with a powerful, albeit narrow, moat. The REIT's immense value stems from its symbiotic relationship with Loblaw, Canada's largest grocer, which ensures highly predictable cash flows and near-perfect occupancy above 97%. However, Munger would be deeply concerned by the extreme tenant concentration, where over 50% of revenue comes from a single source; this violates his cardinal rule of avoiding obvious points of failure. While the balance sheet is reasonable for a REIT with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio around 7.1x, he would prefer the fortress-like balance sheets of U.S. peers like Regency Centers, which operate with leverage closer to 5.5x. Ultimately, Munger would likely avoid the stock, concluding that while it's a good business, the concentration risk is an unforced error when superior, more diversified alternatives exist. A significant drop in price, creating an undeniable margin of safety, would be required for him to reconsider this stance.
Bill Ackman would view Choice Properties as a high-quality, simple, and predictable business, akin to owning irreplaceable infrastructure. The REIT's primary appeal is its powerful moat derived from its symbiotic relationship with Loblaw, Canada's largest grocer, which ensures highly stable, inflation-protected cash flows and occupancy rates consistently above 97%. Ackman would be particularly attracted to the clear, low-risk catalyst for value creation through the intensification of its existing land bank into mixed-use properties. The main reservation would be the extreme tenant concentration, with over 50% of revenue from Loblaw; however, given Loblaw's market dominance, this risk may be deemed acceptable. For retail investors, Ackman would see this as a solid, long-term compounder, provided they are comfortable with the concentration risk. Ackman would suggest that the best-in-class operators in this space are US-based Regency Centers (REG) and Kimco (KIM) due to their fortress balance sheets (Net Debt/EBITDA of 5.5x) and diversification, while in Canada, SmartCentres (SRU.UN) offers a better risk profile with lower tenant concentration (25%) and leverage. Ackman would likely invest in CHP.UN but might wait for a more attractive entry point to increase his margin of safety against the concentration risk.
Choice Properties REIT stands out in the competitive Canadian real estate landscape primarily through its unique origin and strategic alliance. Spun out from Loblaw Companies Limited, Canada's largest food retailer, Choice Properties maintains an incredibly stable and resilient portfolio anchored by its parent company's grocery stores and associated retail outlets. This symbiotic relationship provides a durable competitive advantage, ensuring high and stable occupancy rates and a predictable revenue stream that is less susceptible to economic downturns compared to REITs focused on discretionary retail. While other REITs scramble to secure anchor tenants, Choice has a built-in, investment-grade tenant that accounts for a significant portion of its rental income, forming the bedrock of its business model.
However, this core strength is also its most significant point of differentiation and potential vulnerability when compared to its peers. Competitors like RioCan and SmartCentres have also focused on necessity-based retail but have intentionally diversified their anchor tenant relationships with companies like Walmart, Costco, and other major grocers. This diversification mitigates the risk associated with the financial health of any single tenant. Choice's heavy reliance on Loblaw, while currently a boon, presents a concentration risk that investors must consider. A downturn in Loblaw's fortunes, however unlikely in the near term, would have a disproportionately large impact on Choice Properties compared to the impact of a single tenant's struggles on its more diversified competitors.
Furthermore, the competitive landscape is shifting towards mixed-use properties, combining retail with residential and office spaces to create high-density urban hubs. While Choice is actively pursuing a development pipeline that includes these elements, competitors like First Capital REIT have a head start, with portfolios already heavily weighted towards prime urban locations. Choice's portfolio, while strong, has a greater suburban footprint. Its ability to successfully execute on its intensification and development strategy will be crucial in determining its long-term competitive positioning against peers who are more established in the urban mixed-use space. This transition from a stable, low-growth entity to a more dynamic developer introduces both opportunity and execution risk not present in its historical operating model.
RioCan REIT represents one of Canada's largest and most diversified retail-focused real estate trusts, making it a primary competitor to Choice Properties. While both entities focus on retail properties, RioCan has a more diversified tenant base and a greater strategic focus on major urban markets. In contrast, CHP.UN's portfolio is defined by its strategic relationship with Loblaw, providing a stable, grocery-anchored revenue stream but with higher tenant concentration. The comparison hinges on an investor's preference for the deep-seated stability and predictability of CHP.UN's model versus RioCan's broader diversification and urban growth strategy.
From a business and moat perspective, RioCan and CHP.UN have distinct advantages. For brand, RioCan is a well-established independent name in Canadian real estate, while CHP.UN's brand is intrinsically linked to Loblaw. Switching costs are high for both, with high tenant retention (RioCan at 93.3%, CHP.UN at 95.7%), making CHP.UN slightly better at keeping its tenants. In terms of scale, RioCan has a larger portfolio by GLA at approximately 36 million square feet versus CHP.UN's 44 million square feet in its retail portfolio, giving CHP.UN an edge in pure size. Network effects are present for both through clustered properties, but RioCan's urban focus in the 'RioCan Living' brand creates a stronger live-work-play ecosystem. Regulatory barriers are similar, but RioCan’s extensive experience in major market development gives it a practical edge. CHP.UN’s primary moat is its relationship with Loblaw, a nearly unbreachable advantage. Winner: CHP.UN for its unparalleled tenant stability, which provides a more durable, albeit less diversified, moat.
Financially, the two REITs are closely matched but with different profiles. In revenue growth, RioCan has shown slightly more aggressive growth recently due to its development pipeline, while CHP.UN is more stable. For margins, both have strong Net Operating Income (NOI) margins, typically in the 60-65% range, with CHP.UN often having a slight edge due to its triple-net lease structure. On profitability, their returns on equity are comparable and fluctuate with property valuations. In liquidity, both maintain strong positions, with RioCan holding a slightly larger credit facility. For leverage, CHP.UN tends to operate with a lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio (around 7.1x) compared to RioCan (around 8.5x), making CHP.UN's balance sheet more resilient. Both have strong interest coverage. For cash generation, CHP.UN's AFFO payout ratio is often lower and thus safer (around 75%) than RioCan's (which can approach 80-85%). Winner: CHP.UN due to its more conservative balance sheet and safer dividend coverage.
Looking at past performance, both have delivered solid results. Over the last 5 years, CHP.UN has delivered slightly more stable, albeit lower, FFO per unit growth compared to RioCan's more cyclical performance. The margin trend for both has been stable, with slight expansion driven by positive leasing spreads. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR) over a five-year period, performance has been similar, with periods where each has outperformed depending on market sentiment towards urban versus defensive assets. On risk metrics, CHP.UN exhibits lower volatility (beta) due to its predictable cash flows and a lower max drawdown during the 2020 pandemic. RioCan's urban and non-essential tenant exposure makes it slightly more sensitive to economic shocks. Winner: CHP.UN for delivering comparable returns with demonstrably lower risk and volatility.
For future growth, RioCan appears to have a more dynamic pipeline. Its primary driver is the 'RioCan Living' residential development program, targeting high-demand urban centers, which offers higher potential returns but also higher execution risk. In contrast, CHP.UN's growth stems from its own development pipeline, including mixed-use projects and acquisitions, but it is fundamentally anchored to the steady expansion of the Loblaw ecosystem. Regarding pricing power, both have demonstrated strong positive rental renewal spreads, often in the +8% to +12% range. CHP.UN has a clear pipeline of intensification projects on existing Loblaw-anchored sites. RioCan's TAM/demand signals are tied to urbanization, while CHP.UN's are tied to non-discretionary consumer spending. Winner: RioCan for its higher-growth potential through its ambitious urban residential strategy, which taps into Canada's housing shortage.
From a valuation perspective, both REITs often trade at similar multiples. Their Price-to-AFFO (P/AFFO) ratios typically hover in the 14x-17x range. CHP.UN often trades at a slight premium to its Net Asset Value (NAV), justified by the perceived safety of its Loblaw relationship. RioCan may trade at a slight discount or premium depending on sentiment around its development pipeline and urban retail exposure. Their dividend yields are also comparable, usually between 5.0% and 6.0%. CHP.UN's lower payout ratio (around 75% vs RioCan's ~80%) suggests a safer dividend. In terms of quality vs. price, CHP.UN offers safety at a fair price. Winner: CHP.UN is the better value today for risk-averse investors, as its valuation is backed by a more secure and predictable cash flow stream, making its dividend yield more reliable.
Winner: Choice Properties REIT over RioCan REIT. While RioCan offers a more dynamic growth story through its aggressive urban mixed-use development pipeline, Choice Properties wins on the core metrics of stability, risk, and financial resilience. CHP.UN's key strength is its unshakeable anchor tenant, Loblaw, which provides highly predictable cash flows and supports a best-in-class occupancy rate of over 97%. Its lower leverage (Net Debt/EBITDA of ~7.1x) and safer AFFO payout ratio (~75%) make it a fundamentally lower-risk investment. RioCan's diversification is a strength, but its higher exposure to non-essential retail and the execution risk in its development pipeline present notable weaknesses. For an investor prioritizing stable income and capital preservation, CHP.UN's defensive moat and conservative financial management make it the superior choice.
SmartCentres REIT is arguably the most direct competitor to Choice Properties, as both have business models heavily reliant on a single, dominant, necessity-based retail anchor. For CHP.UN, it's Loblaw; for SmartCentres, it's Walmart. This makes their comparison a fascinating case study in strategic partnerships. Both portfolios are overwhelmingly focused on community shopping centers that are resilient to e-commerce and economic downturns. The core difference lies in their secondary tenants and the specific strategies they are employing for future growth through property intensification.
In the realm of Business & Moat, both are formidable. For brand, SmartCentres is synonymous with Walmart-anchored power centers across Canada, a very strong public brand. CHP.UN's brand is less public-facing but equally strong through its Loblaw connection. Switching costs are extremely high for both, as Walmart and Loblaw are deeply integrated into their respective sites. Scale is comparable; SmartCentres has a portfolio of approximately 35 million square feet, slightly smaller than CHP.UN's retail portfolio. Network effects are strong for both, as their anchor tenants draw significant, reliable traffic that benefits all other tenants. Regulatory barriers in retail development are a constant for both. The defining other moat for each is their strategic alliance; CHP.UN's relationship with Loblaw is arguably deeper as it originated from the grocer, while SmartCentres has a long-standing but third-party relationship with Walmart. Winner: CHP.UN, by a very narrow margin, due to its corporate integration with its anchor tenant, which creates a slightly more aligned and unbreakable bond.
Analyzing their financial statements reveals two very similar, conservatively managed entities. Revenue growth for both has been steady and predictable, driven by contractual rent escalations and development. Their NOI margins are consistently high and within a few basis points of each other, typically in the 65-70% range. On profitability, both generate stable and comparable returns. A key differentiator is leverage; SmartCentres has historically maintained one of the lowest Net Debt/EBITDA ratios in the sector, often below 7.0x, which is even stronger than CHP.UN's already conservative ~7.1x. Both have excellent liquidity and interest coverage. For AFFO generation, both are strong, but SmartCentres often has a slightly higher AFFO payout ratio (around 80%) compared to CHP.UN (around 75%). Winner: SmartCentres for its superior balance sheet strength, reflected in its industry-leading low leverage metrics.
Past performance for both REITs has been characterized by stability rather than spectacular growth. Over the last five years, their FFO per unit CAGR has been in the low single digits, reflecting the maturity of their core portfolios. Their margin trends have been flat to slightly positive, showcasing excellent operational control. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), both have performed similarly, delivering high-yield, low-volatility returns that appeal to income investors. For risk metrics, both are considered low-beta investments. SmartCentres' reliance on Walmart (~25% of revenue) is high but lower than CHP.UN's reliance on Loblaw (~50%+), making SmartCentres technically less concentrated. Both demonstrated strong resilience during the 2020 downturn. Winner: SmartCentres due to its slightly better risk profile stemming from lower tenant concentration.
Looking ahead, both REITs have pinned their future growth on identical strategies: mixed-use development on their existing, well-located retail lands. SmartCentres has been more aggressive in marketing its $15 billion development pipeline, which includes numerous high-rise residential projects under its 'SmartLiving' brand. CHP.UN also has a significant, multi-billion dollar pipeline focused on similar intensification. The demand signals for both are strong, tied to Canada's housing shortage and the value of their urban/suburban land banks. Pricing power is evident in their positive leasing spreads. The key difference is execution; SmartCentres appears to be further along and more vocal about its transition into a major residential developer. Winner: SmartCentres, as it has demonstrated a slightly faster and more aggressive push into its high-growth residential development pipeline.
Valuation-wise, the market recognizes their similarities, and they often trade in lockstep. Their P/AFFO multiples are usually in the 14x-16x range, reflecting their status as stable, lower-growth entities. Both typically trade at a slight discount to their private market Net Asset Value (NAV), suggesting good value. Their dividend yields are very attractive and often nearly identical, typically in the 5.5% to 6.5% range. The quality vs. price trade-off is excellent for both; investors get high-quality, resilient portfolios at a reasonable price. Given SmartCentres' slightly higher growth ambitions and lower leverage, it might offer a better risk-adjusted return. Winner: SmartCentres is arguably the better value today, as you get a slightly more diversified and less leveraged company with a more aggressive growth plan at a very similar valuation to CHP.UN.
Winner: SmartCentres REIT over Choice Properties REIT. This is an exceptionally close contest between two very similar, high-quality REITs. However, SmartCentres takes the victory due to three key factors: a more conservative balance sheet with lower leverage, a slightly more diversified anchor tenant base (though still concentrated), and a more advanced and aggressive strategy for unlocking value through its residential development pipeline. CHP.UN's primary strength is its deeply integrated relationship with Loblaw, which is also its main weakness due to the immense concentration risk (over 50% of revenue). While both are excellent defensive holdings, SmartCentres offers a slightly better-balanced risk and growth profile, making it the marginally superior investment choice for the long term.
Crombie REIT presents another compelling peer for Choice Properties, sharing a remarkably similar strategic DNA. Just as CHP.UN is strategically aligned with Loblaw, Crombie is tied to Empire Company Limited, the parent company of Sobeys, Safeway, and other grocery banners. This makes Crombie a grocery-anchored REIT with a defensive, necessity-based portfolio. However, Crombie is smaller than CHP.UN and has a geographic concentration in Atlantic Canada, though it has been expanding nationally. The comparison highlights the benefits and risks of a grocer-affiliated model at a different scale and stage of national expansion.
Regarding Business & Moat, Crombie's primary advantage mirrors CHP.UN's. Its brand is tied to Empire's grocery banners, providing immediate recognition and stability. Switching costs are extremely high for its anchor tenant, Empire, which accounts for a significant portion of rent. CHP.UN has a larger scale with nearly double the number of properties and GLA (~28 million sq ft for Crombie vs. ~44 million for CHP.UN). Both leverage their anchor tenants to create network effects, drawing steady traffic. Regulatory barriers are a shared challenge. Crombie's key moat is its strategic partnership with Empire, which provides a pipeline of acquisitions and developments. However, CHP.UN's relationship with Loblaw, the nation's largest grocer, provides access to a larger ecosystem. Winner: CHP.UN due to its superior scale and its alignment with Canada's number one food retailer, which provides a wider and deeper moat.
From a financial perspective, CHP.UN's larger scale provides some advantages. Revenue growth for both has been stable, driven by contractual rent bumps and developments. NOI margins are strong and comparable for both, reflecting the quality of their grocery-anchored assets. On profitability, CHP.UN's larger and more diversified portfolio generally allows for slightly better economies of scale and returns. For leverage, Crombie's Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio is often higher, sometimes exceeding 9.0x, compared to CHP.UN's more conservative ~7.1x. This indicates a higher risk profile for Crombie. Both maintain adequate liquidity. For AFFO generation, CHP.UN's scale again translates into more absolute cash flow, and its AFFO payout ratio is typically more conservative (~75% for CHP.UN vs. ~80% for Crombie). Winner: CHP.UN based on its stronger and more conservative balance sheet, highlighted by its lower leverage.
Examining past performance, both REITs have been reliable performers for income-focused investors. Over the last five years, their FFO per unit growth has been modest but steady. CHP.UN's larger size has provided slightly more stability in its growth trajectory. Margin trends have been stable for both. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), CHP.UN has generally provided slightly better returns with lower volatility, reflecting its larger scale and more conservative balance sheet. For risk metrics, Crombie's smaller size and higher leverage contribute to a slightly higher beta and more potential volatility compared to CHP.UN. The high concentration with Empire (~45% of rent) is a similar risk to CHP.UN's Loblaw concentration. Winner: CHP.UN for its track record of delivering solid returns with a better risk-adjusted profile.
For future growth, both REITs are focused on development and intensification. Crombie has a significant development pipeline, heavily co-sponsored with Empire, focused on creating mixed-use projects at its existing grocery sites. This provides a clear and visible growth path. CHP.UN has a similar, but larger, pipeline. The demand signals for their necessity-anchored retail and associated residential components are strong. Both exhibit good pricing power on lease renewals. Crombie's growth is perhaps more transformative given its smaller base, but CHP.UN's pipeline has a larger absolute scale. Winner: CHP.UN because its larger platform and deeper pipeline offer greater long-term growth potential, even if Crombie's growth may be faster in percentage terms in the short run.
From a valuation standpoint, Crombie often trades at a discount to CHP.UN, reflecting its smaller size, higher leverage, and geographic concentration. Its P/AFFO multiple is typically in the 12x-14x range, lower than CHP.UN's 14x-17x. This discount is also reflected in it often trading at a wider discount to its Net Asset Value (NAV). Consequently, Crombie's dividend yield is often higher, which can be attractive to investors seeking more current income. However, this higher yield comes with higher risk, as evidenced by its higher payout ratio and leverage. The quality vs. price trade-off is clear: CHP.UN is the higher-quality, safer asset, while Crombie is the higher-yielding, higher-risk value play. Winner: Crombie is the better value today for investors willing to accept higher risk for a higher yield and a lower valuation multiple.
Winner: Choice Properties REIT over Crombie REIT. Choice Properties is the clear winner due to its superior scale, stronger balance sheet, and alignment with Canada's leading grocer. While Crombie shares a similar and effective business model, it is essentially a smaller, more leveraged version of CHP.UN. CHP.UN's key strengths are its lower leverage (~7.1x Net Debt/EBITDA vs. Crombie's ~9.0x), larger development pipeline, and greater geographic diversification. Crombie's main weakness is its financial risk profile, and while its valuation is cheaper, the discount does not fully compensate for the additional risk. For a long-term, core holding, CHP.UN's more conservative and robust platform makes it the more prudent and superior investment.
First Capital REIT (FCR.UN) offers a distinct strategic contrast to Choice Properties. While both are major players in Canadian retail real estate, FCR.UN is a pure-play urban landlord, focusing exclusively on high-growth, densely populated neighborhoods in Canada's major cities. Its portfolio is designed to be a collection of irreplaceable, grocery-anchored urban properties. This differs from CHP.UN's broader, more suburban-heavy portfolio, which is defined by its strategic tie to Loblaw rather than a specific geographic strategy. The comparison pits CHP.UN's defensive, stable, national footprint against FCR.UN's high-growth, concentrated urban strategy.
In terms of Business & Moat, FCR.UN's advantage is its real estate. Its brand is synonymous with high-quality urban retail. CHP.UN's brand is tied to its main tenant. Switching costs are high for both. In scale, CHP.UN is significantly larger, with more than double the GLA (~20 million sq ft for FCR.UN). However, FCR.UN's portfolio is arguably of higher quality on a per-square-foot basis due to its prime locations. FCR.UN has strong network effects within its urban neighborhoods, creating complete retail ecosystems. Regulatory barriers are a major moat for FCR.UN, as securing and entitling urban development sites is extremely difficult and time-consuming, giving its existing portfolio a scarcity value. CHP.UN's moat is its tenant relationship. Winner: First Capital REIT for its powerful moat built on irreplaceable urban locations, which is arguably more durable and offers more pricing power than a single tenant relationship.
Financially, the different strategies lead to different profiles. FCR.UN's urban portfolio allows it to command higher rents, leading to potentially higher NOI growth during strong economic times. However, its operating margins can sometimes be slightly lower due to the higher costs of operating in dense urban environments. On leverage, FCR.UN has historically operated with a higher Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio (often above 9.0x) as it executes its development-heavy strategy, making CHP.UN (~7.1x) the more conservative choice. Both maintain strong liquidity. In terms of AFFO generation, FCR.UN's payout ratio is typically higher (often 85% or more) as it retains more capital for development, making CHP.UN's dividend (~75% payout) feel safer. Winner: CHP.UN for its superior balance sheet health and more conservative financial management, which provides greater stability.
Looking at past performance, FCR.UN's returns have been more volatile, reflecting its exposure to the urban market, which was hit harder during the pandemic but also rebounds more sharply. Over a five-year cycle, its FFO per unit growth has been inconsistent due to asset sales and development timing. CHP.UN's performance has been much steadier. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), FCR.UN has the potential for higher returns during bull markets but also experienced a much deeper max drawdown in 2020 than CHP.UN. This highlights its higher risk profile and beta. CHP.UN has consistently been the lower-volatility option. Winner: CHP.UN for delivering more consistent, lower-risk historical performance.
Future growth is where FCR.UN is positioned to excel. Its entire strategy is built on growth through densification of its prime urban sites, with a massive development pipeline that includes significant residential and other commercial uses. The demand signals for urban real estate, despite near-term headwinds, are strong long-term due to immigration and urbanization trends. FCR.UN's pricing power, reflected in its ability to achieve high rental growth in its core markets, is superior to CHP.UN's more modest, albeit stable, growth. While CHP.UN also has a development pipeline, it is less central to its identity and value proposition than it is for FCR.UN. Winner: First Capital REIT for its significantly higher long-term growth potential embedded in its urban land bank.
Valuation often reflects this growth-versus-safety dynamic. FCR.UN frequently trades at a significant discount to its Net Asset Value (NAV), as the market prices in the execution risk and higher leverage associated with its development strategy. Its P/AFFO multiple can be lower than CHP.UN's, and its dividend yield higher, but its dividend is less secure due to a higher payout ratio. CHP.UN trades at a valuation that reflects its stability and lower risk profile. The quality vs. price trade-off is stark: FCR.UN offers potential high growth at a discounted price, but with high risk. CHP.UN offers safety and stability at a fair price. Winner: First Capital REIT is the better value today for investors with a long time horizon and a higher risk tolerance, as the current discount to NAV offers a compelling entry point for its future growth.
Winner: Choice Properties REIT over First Capital REIT. Despite FCR.UN's superior long-term growth profile and irreplaceable urban assets, Choice Properties is the winner for the average retail investor due to its vastly superior risk profile. CHP.UN's key strengths are its stable cash flows, conservative balance sheet (~7.1x leverage vs. FCR.UN's ~9.0x+), and lower-volatility business model. FCR.UN's notable weaknesses are its high leverage, higher dividend payout ratio, and the significant execution risk embedded in its long-term development plan. While FCR.UN could generate higher returns, the path to those returns is far less certain and comes with more risk. For investors prioritizing reliable income and capital preservation, CHP.UN's defensive and financially sound model is the better choice.
Regency Centers (REG) is a leading U.S.-based REIT focused on owning and operating high-quality, grocery-anchored shopping centers in affluent suburban markets. As an international competitor, it provides a best-in-class benchmark for Choice Properties. Both REITs share a strategic focus on necessity-based retail, but Regency boasts greater geographic and tenant diversification across the much larger U.S. market. The comparison illustrates the differences in scale, market dynamics, and operational sophistication between a dominant Canadian player and a top-tier American counterpart.
From a Business & Moat perspective, Regency has a powerful platform. Its brand is highly respected in the U.S. for its high-quality portfolio and operational excellence. Switching costs are high for its tenants. In terms of scale, Regency is a behemoth compared to CHP.UN, with over 400 properties and a market cap several times larger. This scale provides significant advantages in data analytics, tenant relationships, and cost of capital. Network effects are strong within its key suburban markets. Regulatory barriers in its key coastal U.S. markets are extremely high, creating a strong moat for its existing assets. While CHP.UN’s Loblaw relationship is a unique moat, Regency’s moat is built on a diversified portfolio of top-tier grocers (like Publix, Kroger, Whole Foods) in irreplaceable locations. Winner: Regency Centers due to its superior scale, diversification, and portfolio quality across multiple high-barrier-to-entry markets.
Financially, Regency's scale and access to U.S. capital markets give it an edge. Its revenue and FFO growth have been consistently strong, driven by a dynamic U.S. economy and active capital recycling. Its NOI margins are among the best in the industry, reflecting its pricing power and operational efficiency. On profitability, Regency consistently generates a higher Return on Equity. A key differentiator is the balance sheet; Regency maintains an investment-grade credit rating and a lower Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio, typically in the 5.0x-5.5x range, which is significantly stronger than CHP.UN's ~7.1x. It has superior liquidity and access to cheaper debt. Its AFFO payout ratio is also very conservative, often below 70%. Winner: Regency Centers, which operates with a fortress-like balance sheet and demonstrates superior financial performance across nearly every metric.
Reviewing past performance, Regency has a long track record of outperformance. Over the last decade, it has delivered stronger FFO per share growth than CHP.UN. Its margin trend has been positive, driven by strong leasing spreads that often exceed 10-15% on renewals. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), Regency has outperformed most of its Canadian peers, including CHP.UN, over the long term, though this can vary over shorter periods depending on currency fluctuations. On risk metrics, despite operating in a more dynamic market, its strong balance sheet and diversified portfolio give it a very low-risk profile, reflected in its high credit rating. It weathered the 2020 downturn exceptionally well. Winner: Regency Centers for a clear history of superior growth, profitability, and shareholder returns.
Looking at future growth, Regency is well-positioned. Its growth drivers include organic growth from its high-quality portfolio, a disciplined development and redevelopment pipeline in its affluent target markets, and strategic acquisitions. The demand signals for well-located, grocery-anchored U.S. real estate are robust. Its pricing power is consistently among the best in the sector. While CHP.UN's growth is tied to the Loblaw ecosystem, Regency's growth is tied to the broader U.S. consumer economy and its ability to actively manage its portfolio to capture opportunities. Regency's ability to recycle capital from stable assets into higher-growth projects is a key advantage. Winner: Regency Centers for its multiple, well-defined growth levers and its proven ability to execute.
Valuation-wise, quality comes at a price. Regency typically trades at a premium P/FFO multiple compared to CHP.UN, often in the 16x-20x range, reflecting its higher quality, lower risk, and better growth prospects. It usually trades at or slightly above its Net Asset Value (NAV). Its dividend yield is typically lower than CHP.UN's, a direct result of its higher valuation and lower payout ratio. The quality vs. price decision is clear: Regency is the premium, higher-priced asset. While CHP.UN might look cheaper on a yield or multiple basis, the discount is warranted given Regency's superior platform. Winner: CHP.UN is the better value today for an investor focused purely on current yield, but Regency is arguably better value for a total return investor despite its premium valuation.
Winner: Regency Centers over Choice Properties REIT. Regency Centers is the decisive winner, showcasing the advantages of scale, diversification, and operating in the larger, more dynamic U.S. market. Regency's key strengths are its fortress balance sheet (~5.5x leverage), diversified base of top-tier grocery tenants, and a proven track record of superior long-term growth and total returns. CHP.UN's primary weakness in this comparison is its concentration risk with a single tenant and a single country, which limits its growth potential and subjects it to specific economic factors. While CHP.UN is a high-quality, defensive REIT within Canada, Regency operates on a different level and represents a best-in-class model for any grocery-anchored real estate investor.
Kimco Realty (KIM) is one of the largest publicly traded owners and operators of open-air, grocery-anchored shopping centers and mixed-use assets in North America. Following its acquisition of RPT Realty, its scale is immense, dwarfing that of Choice Properties. Kimco's strategy involves owning dominant centers in high-barrier-to-entry coastal and Sun Belt markets in the U.S. This comparison pits CHP.UN's stable, Canadian-focused, single-tenant-centric model against Kimco's massive, diversified, U.S.-focused, multi-tenant platform, highlighting the trade-offs between deep stability and broad diversification.
In the analysis of Business & Moat, Kimco's primary advantage is its sheer size and diversification. Its brand is one of the most established in U.S. retail real estate. Switching costs for its diverse tenant base are high. Kimco’s scale is its biggest moat; with over 500 properties and a massive market capitalization, it enjoys unparalleled access to capital, data, and tenant relationships. Its network effects are powerful, with a national platform that attracts the best retailers. Regulatory barriers in its core markets are very high. Unlike CHP.UN's singular moat with Loblaw, Kimco's moat is its diversified portfolio of thousands of tenants, including top grocers like Albertsons and Ahold Delhaize. No single tenant accounts for more than 5% of its rent. Winner: Kimco Realty for its fortress-like moat built on diversification and overwhelming scale, which makes it far more resilient to any single tenant's failure.
Financially, Kimco is a powerhouse. Its massive scale allows for highly efficient operations and strong NOI margins. Its FFO growth is driven by a combination of organic rent growth, development, and strategic acquisitions. On the balance sheet, Kimco maintains a strong investment-grade credit rating and a conservative Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio, typically in the 5.5x-6.0x range, which is much stronger than CHP.UN's ~7.1x. Its access to debt is cheaper and more flexible. With a very conservative FFO payout ratio (often below 70%), its dividend is exceptionally safe. Winner: Kimco Realty, whose financial strength, flexibility, and conservatism are superior due to its scale and access to deep U.S. capital markets.
Looking at past performance, Kimco has a long history of creating shareholder value. Over the last decade, it has navigated the 'retail apocalypse' by repositioning its portfolio towards grocery-anchored centers, leading to strong FFO per share growth. Its margin trend has been stable to positive as it has upgraded its portfolio quality. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), Kimco has been a strong performer, particularly since it refined its strategy, and has generally outperformed Canadian peers over the long run. Its risk metrics are excellent for its size; its diversification has allowed it to remain stable and it managed the 2020 crisis effectively. Winner: Kimco Realty for its proven ability to adapt its strategy and deliver strong, risk-adjusted returns over the long term.
For future growth, Kimco has multiple avenues. Its growth is driven by leasing its high-quality portfolio at attractive spreads, a significant pipeline of mixed-use development and redevelopment projects, and the potential for further consolidation in the U.S. retail real estate market. The demand signals in its Sun Belt markets are particularly strong. Its pricing power is evident in its high renewal spreads. In contrast, CHP.UN's growth is more limited and tied to a single partner's expansion plans. Kimco's platform is built for proactive growth, while CHP.UN's is more reactive. Winner: Kimco Realty due to its much larger and more diverse set of growth opportunities.
Valuation for Kimco reflects its status as a blue-chip U.S. REIT. It typically trades at a premium P/FFO multiple to CHP.UN, often in the 15x-18x range. The market awards it a higher multiple for its diversification, lower risk profile, and stronger growth prospects. It often trades near its Net Asset Value (NAV). Its dividend yield is generally lower than CHP.UN's, which is typical for a higher-quality company with a lower payout ratio and better growth. The quality vs. price trade-off is clear: Kimco is the superior quality company, and its premium valuation is justified. Winner: Kimco Realty, as its premium valuation is a fair price to pay for its superior quality, safety, and growth outlook, making it better value on a risk-adjusted basis.
Winner: Kimco Realty over Choice Properties REIT. Kimco is the decisive winner in this matchup. It excels on nearly every front: diversification, scale, balance sheet strength, growth opportunities, and track record. Kimco's key strength is its massive, diversified portfolio anchored by a wide array of grocers, which insulates it from single-tenant risk—the primary weakness of CHP.UN's model. While CHP.UN is a solid, defensive investment within the Canadian context, Kimco represents a higher tier of quality and operational sophistication on the North American stage. For an investor seeking a core holding in retail real estate, Kimco's superior risk-adjusted return profile makes it the clear choice.
CT REIT (CRT.UN) provides a unique and highly relevant comparison for Choice Properties. Like CHP.UN, CT REIT was spun out of its primary tenant, Canadian Tire Corporation, and maintains a portfolio heavily concentrated with that single retailer. Both REITs offer investors a story of stability, predictability, and a symbiotic relationship with a major Canadian retailer. The key difference lies in the nature of their anchor tenants: CHP.UN is anchored by a non-discretionary food retailer (Loblaw), while CT REIT is anchored by a discretionary hard goods retailer (Canadian Tire). This distinction is critical to understanding their relative risks and rewards.
From a Business & Moat perspective, their models are nearly identical. CT REIT's brand is inextricably linked with Canadian Tire, one of Canada's most iconic retail brands. Switching costs are exceptionally high, as most properties are purpose-built or critical to Canadian Tire's supply chain and retail network. Scale is smaller for CT REIT, with around 370 properties compared to CHP.UN's ~600 retail properties. Both leverage their anchors to create network effects. The most important moat for both is the tenant relationship, which includes a pipeline for future acquisitions and developments. The key difference is the tenant's industry; grocery is inherently more defensive than general merchandise. Winner: CHP.UN, because its moat is tied to a grocer, which provides superior resilience during economic downturns.
Financially, both are managed very conservatively. Revenue growth for both is slow and steady, driven almost entirely by the contractual rent escalations built into their long-term leases (CT REIT's leases are particularly long, often 15+ years). NOI margins are high and stable for both. On the balance sheet, CT REIT is even more conservative than CHP.UN, with a Net Debt-to-EBITDA ratio that is among the lowest in Canada, often below 6.5x (compared to CHP.UN's ~7.1x). This makes its balance sheet exceptionally safe. Both have excellent liquidity and interest coverage. CT REIT also maintains a very low and safe AFFO payout ratio, often around 70-75%. Winner: CT REIT for its ultra-conservative, best-in-class balance sheet.
Looking at past performance, both have delivered exactly what they promise: stable, predictable, low-volatility returns. Their FFO per unit growth has been remarkably consistent, typically in the 2-3% range annually, almost like a bond. Margin trends have been flat, as expected from their long-term lease structures. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), their performance has been very similar over the last five years, providing a steady stream of dividends with modest capital appreciation. On risk metrics, both are low-beta stocks. However, during the 2020 pandemic, the market priced in more risk for CT REIT due to Canadian Tire's discretionary nature, leading to a slightly larger drawdown than CHP.UN experienced. Winner: CHP.UN for its slightly better performance during a major economic stress test, proving the defensive nature of its grocery anchor.
For future growth, both REITs have limited but highly visible growth pathways. Their growth is not about dynamic leasing or market trends; it's about the steady, planned expansion of their majority tenants. Both have a clear pipeline of property acquisitions and intensifications sourced from their parent companies. The growth is predictable but capped. CHP.UN may have slightly more dynamic potential through its mixed-use development ambitions on urban Loblaw sites, whereas CT REIT's developments are more focused on industrial and single-tenant retail additions. Winner: CHP.UN, as its mixed-use development pipeline offers slightly higher, albeit more complex, long-term growth potential.
In terms of valuation, the market tends to value these two very similarly, recognizing their bond-like characteristics. They often trade at nearly identical P/AFFO multiples, typically in the 15x-17x range, which is a premium for their low-growth profile but justified by their safety. They also trade at similar premiums to their Net Asset Value (NAV). Their dividend yields are usually very close, offering a safe and reliable income stream. The quality vs. price question comes down to tenant quality. An investor pays a similar price for both. Given the more defensive nature of CHP.UN's tenant, it arguably offers better quality for the same price. Winner: CHP.UN is the better value, as you get a more defensive tenant base for a nearly identical valuation.
Winner: Choice Properties REIT over CT REIT. This is a contest between two of the safest REITs in Canada, but Choice Properties emerges as the winner due to the superior, non-discretionary nature of its anchor tenant. While CT REIT has a more conservative balance sheet (~6.5x leverage vs ~7.1x), this advantage is not enough to overcome the fundamental difference in tenant resilience. CHP.UN's key strength is its grocery anchor, which ensures stable performance even in the harshest economic climates. CT REIT's reliance on a discretionary retailer is its primary weakness, introducing a layer of economic sensitivity not present in CHP.UN. For an investor seeking the ultimate in safety and predictability, CHP.UN's tenant profile makes it the more secure long-term holding.
Based on industry classification and performance score:
Choice Properties possesses an exceptionally strong and defensive business model, anchored by its unique strategic relationship with Loblaw, Canada's largest food retailer. Its portfolio is heavily concentrated in necessity-based retail, like grocery stores and pharmacies, providing highly reliable and predictable cash flows that are resilient to economic downturns. While this creates high tenant concentration, the quality of the tenant and the symbiotic nature of the partnership transforms this risk into a powerful competitive moat. The investor takeaway is positive, reflecting a stable, high-quality business with durable advantages.
While specific tenant sales figures are not a primary metric for this REIT type, the exceptional health and creditworthiness of its anchor tenants imply very high property productivity and sustainable rent levels.
Unlike mall REITs, grocery-anchored REITs do not typically report tenant sales per square foot. However, property productivity can be inferred from the strength of the anchor tenants. Loblaw is Canada's largest food retailer with a strong, investment-grade credit rating and consistent performance, ensuring the primary driver of traffic to the centers is healthy. For a grocer, rent as a percentage of sales (occupancy cost) is naturally low and stable, which means the rent is highly affordable and sustainable for the tenant. This low risk of tenant default or distress is a powerful, if indirect, indicator of property productivity and is a core strength of the business model.
The REIT maintains exceptionally high and stable occupancy rates, reflecting the resilient demand for its properties and the essential nature of its tenant base.
Choice Properties consistently reports a portfolio occupancy rate of around 97.5%, a figure that is at the top end of the Canadian retail REIT industry, where averages typically range from 95% to 97%. This high level of occupancy is a testament to its defensive business model. Because its centers are anchored by essential services like grocery stores and pharmacies, they remain attractive to a wide range of other tenants and are less susceptible to vacancies during economic downturns. This stability ensures highly predictable rental revenues and minimizes income loss from empty units, providing a solid foundation for its cash flows.
Choice Properties demonstrates strong pricing power, consistently achieving positive rent growth on new and renewing leases, driven by high demand for its necessity-anchored retail locations.
The REIT's ability to increase rents on expiring leases, known as leasing spreads, is a direct indicator of the health and desirability of its portfolio. Choice Properties consistently reports positive blended cash-releasing spreads, often in the +5% to +10% range, with renewal spreads being even stronger, sometimes exceeding +10%. This performance is notably strong and is generally above the average for its retail REIT peers. This pricing power stems from the high-quality nature of its assets, which are typically located in convenient, high-traffic areas anchored by a leading grocer. The limited supply of such prime retail space gives Choice Properties significant leverage in negotiations, allowing it to pass on inflationary growth and capture market rent increases, which directly translates to higher net operating income.
The REIT's defining feature is its heavy concentration with its strategic partner Loblaw, which presents a theoretical risk but in practice creates an unparalleled moat due to the tenant's high credit quality and the symbiotic relationship.
The tenant roster is uniquely dominated by Loblaw and its banners, which contribute over 50% of the REIT's annual base rent. This level of concentration is exceptionally high compared to peers, where a top tenant might represent 10-20% of rent. Ordinarily, this would be a major risk. However, this risk is substantially mitigated because Loblaw is an investment-grade tenant and a strategic unitholder in the REIT. This alignment ensures a highly secure and stable income stream. The REIT also boasts a very high tenant retention rate, often over 95%, which is significantly above the industry average of around 90%. While the concentration is a point to monitor, the high quality of the income stream and the strategic partnership it represents is the core of the company's competitive advantage.
As one of Canada's largest REITs, Choice Properties benefits from significant scale and density in major markets, which creates operational efficiencies and strong landlord-tenant relationships.
With a portfolio that includes over 600 properties and more than 55 million square feet of gross leasable area, Choice Properties possesses significant scale. This large, national footprint is concentrated in Canada's most important economic hubs, providing a presence in nearly every major market. This scale allows for efficient property management, centralized leasing operations, and provides a distinct advantage when negotiating with national tenants who want to lease space across the country. This scale is a competitive advantage that is above the average for the sub-industry, making it a go-to landlord for retailers looking to co-locate with a market-leading grocer.
Choice Properties REIT shows a mixed but generally stable financial picture. The company generates very strong operating margins around 70% and produces dependable cash flow, which comfortably covers its monthly dividend, as shown by a low FFO payout ratio of about 33%. However, the balance sheet carries a significant amount of debt, with a high Net Debt/EBITDA ratio of 11.83, which is a key risk for investors to monitor. The overall takeaway is mixed; while operations are profitable and the dividend appears safe for now, the high leverage could pose challenges in a shifting interest rate environment.
The dividend is very well-supported by the company's cash flow, with a low payout ratio that provides a substantial safety buffer.
Choice Properties demonstrates excellent dividend sustainability. For the trailing twelve months, the company generated Funds from Operations (FFO) of 1.03 per share and paid a dividend of 0.758 per share. This translates to an FFO payout ratio of 33.26%, which is very conservative and healthy for a REIT. A low payout ratio indicates that the company retains a significant portion of its cash earnings for reinvestment and debt management after paying distributions. The most recent quarter's FFO payout ratio was even lower at 31.26%. This strong coverage means the dividend is not only safe at its current level but also has room to grow. This factor is a clear strength for income-focused investors.
The company is actively investing in its portfolio by acquiring more properties than it sells, but a lack of data on investment yields makes it difficult to assess the quality of this capital allocation.
Choice Properties appears to be in a growth phase, consistently investing in new properties. In the last twelve months, the company spent 354.6M on real estate acquisitions while selling only 77.06M in assets, indicating a net investment in its portfolio. This suggests management is deploying capital to expand its asset base. However, critical metrics such as acquisition cap rates and stabilized yields on development are not provided. Without this data, we cannot determine if these investments are generating returns above the company's cost of capital. While continued investment is a positive sign of a growth strategy, the inability to verify the profitability of these deals presents a risk. We assign a 'Pass' based on the demonstrated commitment to portfolio growth, but investors should be aware of the limited transparency into investment returns.
The company's balance sheet is highly leveraged, with debt levels that are elevated relative to its earnings, creating a significant financial risk.
Leverage is the most significant concern in Choice Properties' financial profile. The Net Debt/EBITDA ratio for the last twelve months was 11.83, which is considerably high and suggests a heavy reliance on debt to finance the business. While no interest coverage ratio is provided, a simple calculation using EBIT (1011M) and interest expense (586.39M) yields a low coverage of approximately 1.72x, signaling a thin margin of safety for covering interest payments from operating profits. Furthermore, the debt-to-equity ratio of 2.44 confirms the balance sheet is debt-heavy. This high level of leverage makes the company more vulnerable to increases in interest rates and could constrain its financial flexibility in the future. Due to these elevated risk metrics, this factor fails the analysis.
The company is achieving positive revenue growth, suggesting healthy underlying performance from its existing properties, though specific same-property data is unavailable.
Specific metrics like Same-Property NOI growth and leasing spreads are not available, which makes a direct assessment difficult. However, we can use overall rental revenue growth as an indicator of the portfolio's organic performance. In the most recent quarter, total revenue grew 4.89% year-over-year, an acceleration from the 2.82% growth seen for the full prior year. This positive and accelerating top-line growth suggests that the underlying portfolio is performing well, likely through a combination of rent increases and stable occupancy. While more detailed data would be preferable, the existing revenue trends are encouraging and support a 'Pass' for this factor.
Extremely high operating margins suggest the company runs its properties very efficiently and has strong control over expenses.
While Net Operating Income (NOI) margin is not explicitly provided, the company's operating margin serves as an excellent proxy and is a major strength. For the last twelve months, the operating margin was 68.78%, and it remained robust in the most recent quarters at 70.24% and 67.42%. These figures are exceptionally high and indicate that a large portion of rental revenue is converted into profit after accounting for property operating expenses. Such strong margins reflect efficient property management, effective cost controls, and likely a high rate of expense recoveries from tenants. This operational excellence is a core strength that supports the company's overall financial health.
Choice Properties has demonstrated a history of stability and resilience, primarily driven by its portfolio of necessity-based retail properties. Over the past five years, the REIT has achieved steady revenue and cash flow growth, with revenue increasing from $1.32 billion in 2020 to $1.47 billion in 2024. A key strength is its very reliable and well-covered dividend, supported by a low FFO payout ratio of around 33%. However, the company carries a significant amount of debt, with total debt consistently around $12 billion. While this leverage is common for REITs, it remains a key risk for investors. The overall investor takeaway is mixed-to-positive, suitable for income-focused investors who are comfortable with high but managed leverage.
The dividend is exceptionally reliable and safe, supported by a very low payout ratio, though its growth has been slow.
Choice Properties is a model of dividend reliability. The dividend per share has grown slowly but consistently, from $0.74 in 2020 to $0.758 in 2024, reflecting an annualized growth rate of about 0.6%. While the growth is minimal, the safety of the dividend is its standout feature. In 2024, the FFO Payout Ratio was a very conservative 33.26%. This is exceptionally low for a REIT, where payout ratios of 70-80% are common. This low ratio means that cash flows cover the dividend payment by a very wide margin, making it highly secure and leaving ample cash for reinvestment in the business. For income-focused investors, this high degree of reliability is a major strength.
Direct same-property NOI figures are unavailable, but steady growth in overall revenue and operating income suggests healthy underlying performance from the core portfolio.
Similar to occupancy data, specific Same-Property Net Operating Income (SPNOI) growth figures are not available in the provided financials. SPNOI is a key metric that shows growth from a stable pool of properties, excluding the impact of acquisitions or dispositions. Despite its absence, the consistent increase in the company's total revenue (up 2.82% in 2024) and operating income (up from $975 million in 2023 to $1.01 billion in 2024) points towards positive performance at the property level. A REIT with a large, mature portfolio cannot generate this type of consistent growth without its existing properties performing well. This steady financial expansion implies a positive track record for same-property growth.
The REIT has maintained high but stable leverage, with recent improvements in its debt-to-equity ratio showing a degree of financial prudence.
Choice Properties operates with a significant debt load, as its total debt has consistently exceeded $11.5 billion for the past five years. While high, this is characteristic of the capital-intensive REIT industry. The company has shown discipline by managing this leverage relative to its earnings and equity. For example, the Debt-to-EBITDA ratio improved from a peak of 13.42x in 2022 to 11.83x in 2024. Similarly, the debt-to-equity ratio has declined from 3.7x in 2021 to 2.44x in 2024. This indicates that while debt remains high in absolute terms, the company is not letting leverage get out of control and is growing its earnings and equity base to better support it. This managed approach, despite the high headline debt number, warrants a pass.
Total returns have been primarily driven by a solid dividend yield, as the stock price has remained largely flat over the past three years.
Choice Properties' total shareholder return (TSR) presents a mixed picture. The stock's low beta of 0.82 indicates it is less volatile than the broader market, which is attractive for risk-averse investors. The return has been heavily reliant on its dividend, which currently yields around 5%. However, capital appreciation has been lacking. The stock's price has stagnated, closing at $12.70 at the end of 2022 and only slightly higher at $12.82 at the end of 2024. While the dividend provides a solid income stream, the lack of price growth over a multi-year period has capped the total return for shareholders. Because a healthy long-term investment should ideally deliver growth through both income and capital gains, the flat price performance is a significant weakness.
While specific occupancy metrics are not provided, the consistent growth in rental revenue and operating cash flow strongly implies a stable and high-occupancy portfolio.
The provided financial statements do not include direct operational metrics such as average occupancy percentage or renewal rates. However, we can infer the portfolio's stability from its financial results. Rental revenue has grown every year for the past three years, from $1.265 billion in 2022 to $1.358 billion in 2024. Operating cash flow has also remained robust and consistent, exceeding $640 million in each of the last three years. Such steady financial performance would be impossible to achieve without high and stable occupancy rates, especially given the REIT's focus on necessity-based tenants like supermarkets and drugstores, which tend to have very stable tenancy. The strong financial track record serves as a reliable proxy for operational stability.
Choice Properties' future growth outlook is a tale of two parts: a highly stable, low-growth core business and a significant, higher-growth development pipeline. The necessity-anchored retail portfolio provides a solid foundation with predictable, modest rent growth from contractual increases and positive leasing spreads. The real engine for future value creation lies in its extensive development program, focused on high-demand industrial and mixed-use residential properties built on its existing land bank. Key headwinds include rising interest rates and construction costs, which could pressure development yields. Compared to peers, Choice's growth is more heavily weighted towards its development execution rather than acquisitions. The investor takeaway is mixed-to-positive, contingent on the successful and profitable execution of its development strategy to supplement its stable core.
The portfolio's long lease terms, particularly with its anchor tenant Loblaw, include contractual annual rent increases that provide a predictable and stable baseline for organic growth.
Choice Properties benefits from a highly visible and reliable internal growth profile due to the structure of its leases. A significant portion of its leases, especially the long-term agreements with its primary tenant Loblaw, contain fixed annual rent escalations, typically in the range of 1.0% to 1.5%. With a weighted average lease term often exceeding 5 years for the total portfolio and much longer for its anchor tenants, these built-in bumps provide a dependable source of cash flow growth year after year, insulating a portion of its revenue from market volatility. This contractual growth serves as a solid foundation on top of which the REIT can layer additional growth from leasing spreads and development activities. This predictability is a key strength that supports a stable distribution and provides a defensive characteristic to the REIT's earnings stream.
The company's most significant growth driver is its extensive and valuable development pipeline, which is focused on intensifying its existing properties with high-demand industrial and residential uses.
Choice Properties' future growth is fundamentally tied to its ability to execute on its large-scale development pipeline. The company has a multi-billion dollar pipeline of projects, primarily focused on building out modern industrial logistics facilities and multi-family residential apartments on land it already owns, often adjacent to or integrated with its retail centers. Management targets attractive development yields, often in the 6% to 7% range, which represents a significant positive spread over the cost of capital and the yields on acquiring stabilized assets in the open market. This process of densification—adding more income-producing square footage to its existing land—is the clearest path to substantial NAV and FFO growth over the next 3-5 years. The successful delivery of these highly pre-leased industrial projects and the lease-up of new residential units will be the primary catalyst for accelerating the company's growth rate beyond its stable retail base.
The REIT consistently captures positive rent growth on lease renewals, indicating that its portfolio rents are below current market rates, which provides a clear opportunity for organic growth as leases expire.
Choice Properties has a demonstrated ability to generate growth by resetting expiring leases to higher market rents. The REIT regularly reports positive blended cash-releasing spreads, often in the mid-to-high single digits, with renewal spreads frequently exceeding +10%. This indicates that the average in-place rent across the portfolio is below what a new tenant would pay today, creating a mark-to-market opportunity. With a staggered lease expiry profile, this allows the REIT to capture incremental rent growth each year. This is particularly potent in its industrial portfolio, where market rent growth has been exceptionally strong. While high occupancy (around 97.5%) means the percentage of the portfolio rolling over each year is manageable, the consistent positive spreads on these rollovers contribute meaningfully to NOI growth.
Management's guidance points towards stable, low single-digit growth from the core portfolio, supplemented by significant capital deployment into its value-creating development pipeline.
Choice Properties' management guidance typically projects a steady and positive outlook, reflecting the resilient nature of its core assets. The company consistently guides for positive Same-Property Net Operating Income (SPNOI) growth, often in the 2% to 3% range, driven by contractual rent steps and positive re-leasing activity. Furthermore, guidance for Funds From Operations (FFO) per share generally shows modest growth, reflecting the stability of the operating portfolio. A key component of the outlook is the planned capital deployment, with hundreds of millions of dollars annually ($500M+) allocated towards the development pipeline. This spending is the primary engine for near-term FFO accretion as new industrial and residential properties are completed and begin generating income. While the guidance for the core portfolio is not spectacular, its stability combined with the clear capital allocation strategy for growth provides investors with a clear and achievable path to value creation.
While not a primary metric for its core retail portfolio, the high pre-leasing rates on its development projects serve the same function as a signed-not-opened backlog, securing future income well before project completion.
For Choice Properties, the traditional 'signed-not-opened' (SNO) backlog for small retail tenants is less critical than the pre-leasing success of its large-scale development projects. The company's strategy is to de-risk its development pipeline by securing commitments from tenants before or during construction. For its industrial developments, it is common for Choice to achieve pre-leasing levels of 90% to 100% prior to completion. This effectively creates a large-scale SNO backlog, locking in hundreds of millions of dollars in future rental income. This high pre-leasing level provides investors with strong visibility into future cash flow growth and demonstrates the robust demand for the new assets being created, confirming the viability of its development strategy and significantly mitigating lease-up risk.
Based on a comprehensive valuation analysis as of January 13, 2026, Choice Properties REIT appears to be fairly valued. The current unit price of C$14.99 sits comfortably within our triangulated fair value range, suggesting the market is appropriately pricing in the REIT's strengths and weaknesses. Key metrics supporting this view include a Price to Funds From Operations (P/FFO) ratio of approximately 14.6x, which is reasonable for a stable, low-growth REIT, and a secure dividend yield of around 5.1%. While the high dividend and stable cash flows are attractive, the REIT's high leverage and limited growth prospects justify its valuation not being higher. The overall takeaway for investors is neutral; the stock is not a bargain, but it offers a reliable income stream at a price that reflects its underlying fundamentals.
The stock trades at a significant premium to its book value, suggesting investors are paying more for the income stream than the stated value of the underlying assets.
Price to Book (P/B) ratio can offer a baseline valuation for asset-heavy companies. Choice Properties' P/B ratio is approximately 2.3x, which means the market values the company at more than double the accounting value of its net assets. While book value for REITs can be misleading due to property depreciation rules, a P/B ratio this high suggests there is no "margin of safety" from the underlying asset values. In contrast, some REITs can trade at or below a P/B of 1.0x, indicating a potential discount. Here, the premium to book value is substantial. This is not necessarily a red flag, as the market is valuing the reliability of the cash flow generated by those assets, but from a strict asset-backing perspective, the stock does not appear cheap, leading to a "Fail".
The company's valuation is burdened by very high leverage, with a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio that is well above conservative levels.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) provides a holistic valuation picture by including debt. CHP.UN's EV/EBITDA multiple is high at 17.5x to 21.6x, depending on the source. More importantly, this high enterprise value is driven by a large amount of debt. The prior financial analysis flagged a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio of 11.83x. This is significantly elevated for a REIT and is a key financial risk. While the company's stable cash flows can service this debt, it leaves little room for error and makes the company highly sensitive to rising interest rates. A low interest coverage ratio of approximately 1.7x further underscores this risk. Because prudent valuation requires a healthy balance sheet, the excessive leverage makes this factor a "Fail".
The dividend yield is attractive and exceptionally safe, supported by a very low cash flow payout ratio.
Choice Properties offers a dividend yield of approximately 5.1%, which is compelling for income-seeking investors. The critical question is its safety. Prior financial analysis revealed a Funds From Operations (FFO) payout ratio of just 33.26%, which is extremely conservative. This means the REIT uses only a third of its core cash earnings to pay its distribution. This low ratio provides a massive cushion against unforeseen operational issues and ensures the dividend is not only sustainable but has ample room for modest growth in the future. The 3-year dividend growth has been low at around 1.09%, reflecting a focus on reliability over expansion, which is a hallmark of this REIT. This combination of a solid starting yield and best-in-class safety warrants a clear "Pass".
The REIT is currently trading at the high end of its historical P/FFO valuation range, suggesting it is fully valued compared to its own recent past.
Currently, CHP.UN's P/FFO multiple of ~14.6x is positioned at the upper end of its typical 5-year historical range of 12x-14x. Similarly, its current dividend yield of 5.1% is solid but not at the highest levels seen in recent years, which would have signaled a cheaper valuation. Trading above the historical average multiple indicates that the current price already reflects the positive aspects of the business, such as its stability and defensive positioning. There does not appear to be a mean-reversion opportunity where the stock looks unusually cheap compared to its own history. Because the valuation is on the expensive side of its historical trend, this factor receives a "Fail".
The REIT trades at a P/FFO multiple that, while at a premium to peers, is justified by its superior cash flow stability and predictability.
Price to Funds from Operations (P/FFO) is the most important valuation multiple for REITs. CHP.UN currently trades at a P/FFO (TTM) of approximately 14.6x. As noted previously, this is higher than its main Canadian peers like RioCan (10.1x), SmartCentres (11.7x), and CT REIT (~12.0x). However, a simple comparison is insufficient. Choice Properties' defensive moat, stemming from its relationship with Loblaw, provides unparalleled income security. Investors are willing to pay a premium for this stability, especially when economic uncertainty is high. While the multiple isn't low in absolute terms, it fairly reflects the lower-risk, lower-growth profile of the business. Therefore, the multiple is considered reasonable for its specific business model, earning it a "Pass".
The most significant company-specific risk for Choice Properties is its deep-rooted tenant concentration. Loblaw Companies Ltd. and its various brands (like Shoppers Drug Mart and No Frills) account for over 50% of the REIT's revenue. While this relationship provides stable and predictable cash flow today, it creates a major dependency. Any future strategic shifts by Loblaw, such as store network consolidation or a slowdown in their business, would directly and significantly impact Choice's financial performance. This concentration risk is a structural vulnerability that reduces the diversification benefits investors typically seek in a large REIT portfolio. Furthermore, while grocery-anchored retail is resilient, the continued rise of e-commerce and online grocery delivery could slowly erode the long-term competitive advantage of physical stores, potentially impacting future rent growth.
From a macroeconomic perspective, Choice Properties is highly sensitive to interest rate fluctuations. As a real estate entity, it relies on debt to fund acquisitions and development projects. A sustained period of higher interest rates, which is a key risk heading into 2025 and beyond, would increase the cost of refinancing its existing debt and make new investments less profitable. This can squeeze cash flow available for distributions to unitholders. Moreover, property valuations in the real estate sector are inversely related to interest rates; as rates rise, the capitalization rates used to value properties tend to increase, which can lead to a decrease in the stated value of the REIT's assets on its balance sheet. An economic downturn would also pose a risk, as reduced consumer spending would pressure the smaller, non-grocery tenants within Choice's shopping centers, potentially leading to higher vacancy rates and a need for rent concessions.
Looking at its balance sheet and growth strategy, Choice must carefully manage its leverage. The REIT operates with a substantial amount of debt, with a net debt to EBITDA ratio typically hovering above 7x. While manageable in a low-rate environment, this level of debt becomes a greater concern when interest costs are rising. The REIT's ability to grow in the future will also be challenged. Growth for REITs often comes from acquisitions, but higher borrowing costs can make it difficult to find deals that are accretive, meaning they add to earnings per unit. This may force the company to rely more heavily on its development pipeline, which carries its own set of risks, including construction cost overruns, project delays, and the challenge of leasing up new properties in a potentially weaker economic environment.
Click a section to jump