KoalaGainsKoalaGains iconKoalaGains logo
Log in →
  1. Home
  2. US Stocks
  3. Automotive
  4. LKQ

This comprehensive analysis, last updated on October 24, 2025, delves into LKQ Corporation (LKQ) from five critical perspectives: Business & Moat, Financial Statements, Past Performance, Future Growth, and Fair Value. We contextualize our findings by benchmarking LKQ against industry peers like Genuine Parts Company (GPC), AutoZone, Inc. (AZO), and O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. (ORLY), applying key principles from the investment philosophies of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.

LKQ Corporation (LKQ)

Mixed. LKQ Corporation is a global leader in distributing recycled and aftermarket auto parts to professional repair shops. Its key strength is its massive network, which ensures rapid parts delivery. The company generates strong, consistent cash flow, reporting around $810M in 2024. However, its financial health is challenged by significant debt of $5.9B and a recent decline in earnings. The stock appears undervalued compared to peers, trading at a low Price-to-Earnings ratio of 11.29. Driven by the steady demand from an aging vehicle fleet, this may suit value-focused investors. However, they should watch for improvements in its profitability before buying.

US: NASDAQ

60%
Current Price
--
52 Week Range
--
Market Cap
--
EPS (Diluted TTM)
--
P/E Ratio
--
Forward P/E
--
Avg Volume (3M)
--
Day Volume
--
Total Revenue (TTM)
--
Net Income (TTM)
--
Annual Dividend
--
Dividend Yield
--

Summary Analysis

Business & Moat Analysis

4/5

LKQ Corporation's business model centers on being a leading global distributor of alternative vehicle parts and accessories, distinguishing itself from typical storefront retailers that cater heavily to do-it-yourself (DIY) customers. LKQ’s core operation is a large-scale B2B (business-to-business) enterprise focused on the 'do-it-for-me' (DIFM) market, which includes professional collision repair centers (body shops) and mechanical service shops. The company's value proposition is built on providing a comprehensive selection of parts, rapid delivery, and competitive pricing, enabled by its immense scale. Its main product categories are not just singular items but entire supply chain solutions: European Parts Distribution, North American Wholesale Parts, and Specialty Aftermarket accessories. Together, these segments represent the vast majority of the company's revenue, which totaled $14.36 billion in the most recent fiscal year. This model thrives on logistics, inventory management, and procurement power, making it a complex but highly defensible operation.

The largest segment for LKQ is its European Parts Distribution, which generated $6.41 billion in revenue, accounting for approximately 45% of the company's total sales. This division supplies a vast range of products, including aftermarket, recycled, and some OEM parts, to independent repair shops, chains, and specialists across the continent. The European automotive aftermarket is a massive, mature market, estimated to be worth over €250 billion, but it is also highly fragmented with a lower growth CAGR, typically in the low single digits. Competition is intense and varies by country, ranging from large, multinational players like GPC's Alliance Automotive Group to countless small, local distributors. LKQ's main competitors, including GPC and Parts Holding Europe, also leverage scale, but LKQ's network is among the most extensive. The primary customer is the independent European 'garage' or repair shop. These businesses manage repairs for a wide variety of vehicle makes and models and absolutely depend on suppliers who can deliver the correct part with speed and accuracy. Customer stickiness is high for suppliers who prove reliable, as shop profitability hinges on maximizing vehicle throughput. LKQ's competitive moat in Europe is built on economies of scale in both purchasing and logistics. Its dense network of distribution centers, built over years of acquisitions and organic growth, allows for rapid delivery times that smaller competitors cannot match. This scale gives LKQ significant purchasing power with parts manufacturers, enabling it to offer competitive prices while maintaining healthy margins, a critical advantage in a fragmented and price-sensitive market.

In its home market, the North American Wholesale segment is a powerhouse, generating $5.76 billion in revenue, or about 40% of the company's total. This segment is unique in the industry as it combines two distinct product lines: recycled OEM parts sourced from salvage vehicles and a full suite of new aftermarket parts, including its own private brands like Keystone. The North American DIFM market is robust, valued at over $100 billion, and grows steadily as the average age and complexity of vehicles on the road increase. Profit margins on recycled parts can be particularly attractive, as the primary cost is the acquisition of salvage vehicles at auction. In the collision repair space, LKQ's primary competition comes from other salvage operators and the powerful influence of insurance companies, which often dictate the type of parts used in repairs. In the mechanical repair space, it competes head-to-head with the professional arms of major retailers like O'Reilly (O'Reilly Professional), GPC (NAPA), and Advance Auto Parts (Carquest/Worldpac). The customer base consists of collision repair centers and general mechanical shops. These professional customers are less brand-loyal and more focused on part availability, quality, and speed of delivery. Their spending is non-discretionary, tied directly to vehicle repairs, which makes this revenue stream highly resilient. LKQ's moat in North America is exceptionally strong due to its dual-sourcing model. Its dominance in the vehicle salvage market provides a unique, low-cost supply of OEM-quality parts that pure-play aftermarket distributors cannot offer. This, combined with a massive logistics network for rapid delivery, creates a formidable competitive advantage that is extremely difficult and capital-intensive to replicate.

The third key business line is the Specialty Aftermarket segment, which contributed $1.66 billion in revenue, roughly 11.5% of the total. This division focuses on distributing a wide array of non-essential, high-performance parts, accessories, and equipment for vehicles, including RVs, trucks, and performance cars. This is a more niche market compared to standard repairs, with a market size that is harder to define but caters to enthusiasts and specialized installers. The growth and profitability of this segment are often tied to consumer discretionary spending, making it more cyclical than the core repair business. Competition includes other large specialty distributors like Turn 14 Distribution as well as a fragmented landscape of smaller players and online retailers. The customer is a mix of specialty installation shops, RV dealers, and avid DIY enthusiasts who are passionate about customizing their vehicles. Customer stickiness is often based on the breadth of the product catalog, availability of sought-after brands, and technical support. The competitive position of LKQ in this segment is derived from its scale, which allows it to maintain a vast inventory of SKUs and, in some cases, secure exclusive distribution rights for popular brands. However, the moat here is less durable than in its core wholesale segments. The business is more exposed to online competition and shifts in consumer spending habits, making it a valuable but less resilient part of the overall company.

In conclusion, LKQ's competitive moat is deep and well-defined, stemming primarily from structural advantages rather than a single brand or technology. The company has methodically built a global logistics and procurement machine that is exceptionally difficult to replicate. Its scale in purchasing both new aftermarket parts and salvage vehicles provides a sustainable cost advantage. This procurement strength is paired with a dense, sophisticated distribution network designed to meet the exacting demands of professional repair customers, for whom speed and availability are paramount. This creates a virtuous cycle: scale enables better service and pricing, which attracts more customers, further increasing scale. The sheer capital investment and operational expertise required to challenge this model create a very high barrier to entry, protecting LKQ's market position.

Ultimately, the business model appears highly resilient and durable over the long term. While the Specialty segment introduces a degree of cyclicality, the core wholesale operations in North America and Europe are tied to the non-discretionary need for vehicle repair, which remains stable even during economic downturns. The increasing complexity of modern vehicles further entrenches the role of the professional mechanic and, by extension, suppliers like LKQ. The primary risks to the business are not from direct competitors replicating its model, but rather from operational challenges in managing such a vast and complex global enterprise and potential long-term shifts in vehicle technology, such as the transition to electric vehicles, which have different repair needs. However, for the foreseeable future, LKQ's entrenched position, unique product mix, and massive scale provide a powerful and lasting competitive edge.

Financial Statement Analysis

1/5

From a quick health check, LKQ Corporation is currently profitable, reporting a net income of $690 million for the 2024 fiscal year and $180 million in its most recent quarter. The company successfully converts these profits into real cash, with annual operating cash flow of $1.12 billion significantly exceeding net income. The balance sheet, however, warrants a degree of caution. With $5.5 billion in total debt compared to just $289 million in cash, its financial position is heavily leveraged. Near-term stress is visible in the latest quarterly results, which show a noticeable compression in operating margins compared to the full-year figures, suggesting rising costs or pricing challenges.

The income statement reveals a stable top line but weakening profitability. For the full fiscal year 2024, LKQ generated revenues of $14.36 billion with a healthy operating margin of 9.38%. In the most recent quarter (Q3 2025), revenue was $3.5 billion, but the operating margin contracted to 8.23%. This decline in a key profitability metric is a concern for investors, as it suggests that the company's ability to control costs or maintain pricing power may be eroding. While the gross margin remains robust at over 38%, the pressure on operating income indicates that higher operating expenses are eating into profits before interest and taxes are even considered.

A crucial question for any investor is whether accounting profits are translating into actual cash, and for LKQ, the answer for the full year is a definitive yes. In fiscal 2024, operating cash flow (CFO) was $1.12 billion, substantially higher than the reported net income of $690 million. This indicates high-quality earnings. Free cash flow (FCF), the cash left after funding capital expenditures, was also very strong at $810 million. The annual cash flow statement provides insight into this performance; while cash was used to increase inventory (-$253 million), this was almost entirely offset by an increase in accounts payable (+$251 million), showing the company effectively uses credit from its suppliers to manage its cash cycle.

Examining the balance sheet reveals a picture of manageable liquidity but high leverage, placing it in the 'watchlist' category. As of the latest quarter, the company's current ratio stood at 1.6, meaning its short-term assets were 1.6 times its short-term liabilities, providing an adequate buffer for operational needs. However, the leverage is significant, with total debt of $5.5 billion and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.84. While the company's annual operating income of nearly $1.35 billion provides sufficient coverage for its interest expenses, the sheer size of the debt load could pose risks in a downturn or if interest rates rise, limiting financial flexibility.

The company’s cash flow engine appears dependable, based on its latest annual performance. LKQ generated over $1.1 billion in cash from its core operations in fiscal 2024. It invested $311 million in capital expenditures to maintain and grow the business, a reasonable amount relative to its size. The substantial free cash flow of $810 million was then primarily deployed to reward shareholders. This strong and consistent cash generation is the company's primary financial strength, allowing it to service its debt, invest in the business, and return capital to investors simultaneously.

LKQ demonstrates a firm commitment to shareholder returns, which are currently funded sustainably by its cash flows. The company pays a stable quarterly dividend, totaling $318 million for fiscal 2024, which was easily covered by its $810 million in free cash flow. Furthermore, LKQ actively repurchases its own stock, spending $360 million on buybacks in the same period. This has successfully reduced the number of shares outstanding from 264 million at the end of fiscal 2024 to 257 million in the latest quarter, which helps boost earnings per share. This balanced capital allocation strategy appears sustainable as long as cash generation remains robust.

In summary, LKQ's financial foundation has clear strengths and weaknesses. The key strengths are its powerful cash flow generation (annual FCF of $810 million) and its consistent, well-funded shareholder return program. However, investors must weigh these against significant red flags. The most prominent risks are the high debt level of $5.5 billion and the recent, notable decline in operating margins to 8.23% from 9.38% annually. Overall, the financial foundation looks stable enough to support operations and shareholder returns for now, but the combination of high leverage and margin pressure creates a risk profile that requires careful monitoring.

Past Performance

2/5

Over the past five years, LKQ's performance has been a tale of two distinct periods. A comparison of its 5-year versus 3-year trends reveals a business that saw momentum peak and then recede. The 5-year compound annual revenue growth rate (CAGR) from FY2020 to FY2024 was a steady 5.4%, while the most recent 3-year period shows a similar pace, indicating consistent top-line expansion. However, the story for profitability is starkly different. While the 5-year EPS CAGR is a positive 5.8%, this masks severe recent declines; the CAGR for the last three years is a negative 20.6%. This highlights that the strong earnings growth seen in 2021 and 2022 has reversed course.

A similar downward trend is visible in its cash generation. Free cash flow (FCF), a key strength for LKQ, averaged $1.04 billion annually over the last five years. But over the more recent three-year period, the average fell to $945 million, with the latest fiscal year recording $810 million. This pattern of steady revenue growth contrasted with deteriorating profits and cash flow suggests that while the company can still expand its sales, it has struggled to maintain its peak operational efficiency and profitability in the face of changing market conditions or rising costs.

An examination of the income statement confirms this trend. Revenue grew from $11.6 billion in FY2020 to $14.4 billion in FY2024, a period of consistent, if not spectacular, growth. The critical issue lies in profitability. Operating margin, a measure of core business profitability, was strong at 11.41% in FY2021 and 11.27% in FY2022. However, it has since compressed, falling to 10.28% in FY2023 and further to 9.38% in FY2024. Consequently, after net income peaked at $1.15 billion in FY2022, it dropped by over 40% to $690 million just two years later. This margin compression and profit decline suggest the company is facing significant headwinds from either input costs, pricing pressure, or a less favorable mix of products and services sold.

The balance sheet, a reflection of financial stability, has also shown some signs of weakening. For several years, LKQ managed its debt levels effectively, with total debt decreasing from $4.35 billion in FY2020 to $3.94 billion in FY2022. However, total debt jumped significantly to $5.64 billion in FY2023, where it has remained elevated. This pushed the company's debt-to-equity ratio from a conservative 0.72 in FY2022 to a higher 0.93 in FY2024. While the company maintains adequate liquidity with over $2 billion in working capital, this increased leverage introduces more financial risk, particularly at a time when earnings are declining.

Despite weakening profitability, LKQ's cash flow performance remains a key historical strength. The company has consistently generated substantial positive cash from operations, exceeding $1.1 billion every year over the past five years. This demonstrates the resilience of its underlying business model in converting sales into cash. Free cash flow, which is the cash left after paying for operational expenses and capital investments, has also been robust, never dipping below $800 million. However, the trend is concerning, as FCF has fallen from a high of $1.27 billion in FY2020 to $810 million in FY2024. This decline shows that the issues impacting net income are also affecting the amount of cash available for shareholders and debt repayment.

From a capital allocation perspective, LKQ has been very active. The company did not pay a dividend in FY2020 but initiated one in FY2021 at $0.25 per share. It has increased this payout every year since, reaching $1.20 per share in FY2024, demonstrating a clear commitment to providing a regular cash return to investors. Alongside dividends, LKQ has executed a consistent share buyback program. The number of shares outstanding has been reduced each year, falling from 305 million in FY2020 to 264 million in FY2024, a total reduction of over 13%.

These capital actions have generally benefited shareholders, but their effectiveness has been muted by the company's recent performance. The aggressive share buybacks provided a floor for Earnings Per Share (EPS), but the fall in net income was too steep to overcome, leading to the EPS decline since 2022. The dividend appears sustainable for now; total dividend payments in FY2024 were $318 million, which was comfortably covered by the $810 million in free cash flow. However, the payout ratio based on earnings has climbed to 46%. While manageable, this level, combined with declining cash flow and higher debt, reduces the company's financial flexibility. Overall, management has demonstrated a shareholder-friendly approach, but it is now challenged by a weaker fundamental performance.

In conclusion, LKQ's historical record does not show steady, consistent execution but rather a cyclical pattern of strong performance followed by a period of decline. The company's resilience is demonstrated by its ability to consistently generate large amounts of cash. This has been its single biggest historical strength, allowing it to fund acquisitions, dividends, and buybacks. Its primary weakness has been the volatility in its profitability, with margins and earnings proving unable to sustain their 2021-2022 peak levels. The past five years show a mature company that rewards shareholders but is currently navigating a more challenging operating environment.

Future Growth

3/5

The automotive aftermarket industry is poised for steady, albeit not spectacular, growth over the next 3-5 years, driven by fundamental and enduring trends. The most significant factor is the ever-increasing average age of the vehicle fleet. In the U.S., the average age of light vehicles on the road has climbed to a record of over 12.5 years, a trend mirrored in Europe. This is a direct result of improved vehicle quality and, more recently, the high cost of new and used cars, which incentivizes consumers to repair their existing vehicles rather than replace them. This aging fleet is LKQ's core demand driver, as vehicles past the 6-11 year sweet spot enter their prime years for needing significant repairs, moving beyond simple maintenance. Annually, the aftermarket is projected to grow at a CAGR of 3-5%, a resilient rate that underpins LKQ's revenue base.

Several shifts are reshaping the industry's landscape. First, vehicle complexity is skyrocketing with the proliferation of Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS), sophisticated electronics, and hybrid powertrains. This trend pushes more repair work away from do-it-yourself (DIY) enthusiasts and into the hands of professional technicians, directly benefiting LKQ's 'do-it-for-me' (DIFM) focus. Second, while the transition to battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is a long-term threat to traditional engine and transmission parts, in the next 3-5 years, its impact will be more nuanced. BEVs still require collision repair, tires, brakes, and suspension work, creating new opportunities for specialized parts. Catalysts for demand include potential 'right to repair' legislation, which could further empower independent shops, and the sheer volume of miles driven, which directly correlates with parts wear. Competitive intensity remains high, but the barriers to entry are rising. The immense capital required for logistics, inventory, and technology makes it increasingly difficult for smaller players to compete with the scale of giants like LKQ, suggesting a future of continued industry consolidation.

LKQ's North American Wholesale segment, generating ~$5.8 billion annually, is a cornerstone of its growth strategy. Current consumption is driven by both collision repair centers and general mechanical shops. The key constraint in the collision space is the influence of insurance companies, which often have preferred parts policies that can dictate the use of new OEM, aftermarket, or recycled parts. For mechanical shops, the constraint is intense competition from the professional arms of retailers like O'Reilly, Advance Auto, and GPC/NAPA, which compete fiercely on delivery speed and price. Over the next 3-5 years, consumption of complex electronic and ADAS-related components is set to increase significantly. LKQ is uniquely positioned here with its recycled parts business, as it can supply OEM sensors and modules from salvaged late-model vehicles, often before aftermarket versions are even available. Conversely, demand for some traditional mechanical parts may see slower growth. The market will shift further toward digital procurement, with shops using online portals to check inventory and place orders, demanding deeper integration with shop management systems. The North American DIFM market is valued at over ~$100 billion, and LKQ's ability to offer a unique blend of parts is a key differentiator. Customers in collision repair often choose LKQ for the availability of OEM-quality recycled parts, which offer a cost-effective alternative to new dealer parts. In mechanical repair, the choice is driven by speed and availability. LKQ outperforms when a repair requires a mix of parts that a single competitor cannot provide. However, for common mechanical parts, companies like O'Reilly with their dense store networks may have a delivery speed advantage. The industry continues to consolidate as scale becomes critical for profitability. This trend will likely accelerate, benefiting large players like LKQ. A key future risk is a faster-than-expected adoption of EVs, which would structurally reduce demand for a significant portion of LKQ's traditional parts catalog. While the probability is medium over the next decade, its impact in the next 3-5 years is lower, as the existing internal combustion engine (ICE) fleet will dominate the repair market for years to come.

In Europe, the Parts Distribution segment is LKQ's largest, with revenues of ~$6.4 billion. The market is mature and highly fragmented, with current consumption spread across thousands of independent garages. Consumption is constrained by intense price competition from a mix of large pan-European distributors and smaller, local players. Navigating the varied regulations and market structures of each country also adds complexity. Over the next 3-5 years, the primary growth driver will be consolidation. LKQ is expected to continue acquiring smaller distributors to build network density and achieve greater economies of scale. Consumption will likely increase for parts related to newer, more complex European vehicles, while the market for parts for very old, simple cars may decline. The overall European aftermarket is estimated to be worth over €250 billion, with low-single-digit growth prospects. Customers, primarily independent garages, choose suppliers based on parts availability, delivery speed, and established relationships. LKQ's scale gives it a significant advantage in purchasing power and the ability to maintain a broader inventory than most competitors. It will outperform in markets where it has achieved significant logistical density, allowing for rapid and reliable delivery. However, local competitors with deep, long-standing relationships can still win business, especially in more rural areas. The number of distributors in Europe has been steadily decreasing and will continue to do so as scale becomes paramount for survival. A significant risk for LKQ in Europe is a prolonged economic downturn on the continent. A recession could pressure repair volumes and intensify price competition, potentially squeezing LKQ's European EBITDA margins, which currently hover around 10%. The probability of this risk is medium, given the current macroeconomic uncertainties in the region.

LKQ's Specialty Aftermarket segment, with ~$1.7 billion in revenue, caters to enthusiasts and specialized installers in niches like RVs, performance cars, and trucks. Current consumption is highly discretionary and is therefore constrained by consumer confidence and economic conditions. When household budgets tighten, spending on vehicle accessories and performance upgrades is one of the first things to be cut. The key growth driver for this segment over the next 3-5 years is product innovation and expansion into new categories, such as accessories for the growing population of trucks and SUVs used for 'overlanding' and outdoor recreation. Consumption will likely increase for functional accessories, while purely aesthetic or high-end performance upgrades may face headwinds in a weaker economy. The market will also continue its pronounced shift towards e-commerce channels. The specialty equipment market in the U.S. is valued at over ~$50 billion. Customers in this space are driven by brand selection, product availability, and technical expertise. Competitors range from other large distributors to a vast number of online retailers. LKQ's advantage is its broad catalog and distribution capabilities, allowing it to be a one-stop-shop for specialty installers. However, nimble online players focused on specific niches can often build stronger brands and community followings, winning share among enthusiasts. The industry structure is mixed, with consolidation among large distributors but a proliferation of small online sellers. The most significant risk to this segment is its cyclicality. In the event of a recession, a decline in discretionary spending could cause revenue in the Specialty segment to fall by 10-15% or more, significantly impacting its profitability. The probability of this risk is medium, as it is tied directly to the broader economic cycle.

LKQ's recycled parts operation is not a separate segment but a crucial, integrated component of its North American business that warrants specific analysis for future growth. The current consumption of recycled OEM parts is highest in the collision repair industry, where they are valued as a cost-effective, high-quality alternative to new OEM parts. Consumption is limited by supply (the number of late-model vehicles declared total losses) and by insurance company policies that may favor cheaper aftermarket alternatives. Over the next 3-5 years, the value and consumption of recycled parts are poised to increase. As vehicles become packed with expensive sensors, cameras, and modules for ADAS, the cost of new OEM replacements can be prohibitive. Recycled components from salvaged vehicles offer a much more affordable solution, making repairs economically viable. This trend will accelerate as more cars with these advanced systems enter the salvage pool. The catalyst for growth is the ever-increasing cost and complexity of vehicle technology. Customers, primarily body shops, choose recycled parts for their OEM fit and function at a lower price point. LKQ is the undisputed leader in this space, with a salvage auction and dismantling network that is virtually impossible to replicate. Its ability to procure, inventory, and distribute these parts at scale is its most durable competitive advantage. The primary risk is a long-term decline in accident frequency due to the effectiveness of ADAS technology. If safety systems drastically reduce collision rates, the supply of salvage vehicles and the demand for collision parts would both decrease. The probability of this having a major impact in the next 3-5 years is low, but it is a high-probability risk over a 10-15 year horizon.

Beyond its core segments, LKQ's future growth will also depend on its strategic execution. The company is actively pursuing operational excellence initiatives aimed at improving efficiency and margins across its vast global network. This includes optimizing its supply chain, integrating its various IT systems, and leveraging data analytics for better inventory management. Furthermore, LKQ's capital allocation strategy will be a key determinant of shareholder value creation. The company has a history of growth through acquisition, and it will likely continue to act as a consolidator in the fragmented European and North American markets. Balancing these acquisitions with share repurchases and debt management will be critical. A major challenge and opportunity lies in digital transformation. While the company is investing in e-commerce platforms for its professional customers, it must accelerate these efforts to meet the evolving expectations of a more tech-savvy generation of shop owners and managers. A seamless, integrated digital ordering and workflow experience is no longer a nice-to-have but a competitive necessity. Finally, the long-term specter of electrification remains the most significant strategic question. While not an immediate threat to the bulk of its business, LKQ must develop a clear strategy to participate in the EV aftermarket, which will require new supplier relationships, technician training programs, and a product catalog focused on batteries, electric motors, and thermal management systems. Its success in navigating this transition will ultimately define its growth trajectory in the coming decade.

Fair Value

5/5

As of December 26, 2025, LKQ's stock price of $30.26 places its market capitalization at approximately $7.75 billion, positioning it in the lower third of its 52-week range ($28.13 - $44.82). This suggests significant market pessimism over the past year. Key metrics support an undervaluation thesis: the trailing P/E ratio is a modest ~11.2x, while the forward EV/EBITDA ratio is ~7.9x. These figures are compelling on their own, but they are further bolstered by an attractive Free Cash Flow (FCF) Yield exceeding 10% and a dividend yield approaching 4.0%, highlighting the company's robust ability to generate cash relative to its market price.

When compared to its peers, LKQ trades at a significant discount. Its P/E and EV/EBITDA multiples are substantially lower than those of retail-focused competitors like AutoZone (AZO) and O'Reilly (ORLY). While this discount is partly justified by LKQ's different business model, which results in lower gross margins (~38% vs. >50% for peers), the current valuation gap appears overly wide. Professional analysts seem to agree, with a consensus 12-month price target between $41.18 and $44.33, implying an upside of over 36% from the current price. This consensus, along with a relatively tight dispersion of price targets, suggests a broad agreement that the stock is undervalued.

An intrinsic value assessment using a discounted cash flow (DCF) model reinforces this view. Based on conservative assumptions—including 6% FCF growth for five years and a 9%-11% discount rate—the DCF model yields a fair value range of approximately $45–$58 per share. This suggests the business is worth substantially more than its current stock price if it continues its modest growth trajectory. This conclusion is cross-checked and confirmed by yield-based metrics. The company's powerful FCF yield of ~10.5% is significantly higher than typical bond yields, implying investors receive a substantial cash return. Valuing the company on a more standard 6%-8% FCF yield would imply a share price between $39 and $52.

Historically, LKQ also appears cheap. Its current P/E ratio of ~11.2x and EV/EBITDA multiple of ~7.9x are both trading at a discount to their respective 5-year averages (12.4x-14.8x P/E and ~10.6x EV/EBITDA). By triangulating all valuation methods—analyst consensus ($41–$44), DCF ($45–$58), yield-based metrics ($39–$52), and historical multiples—a conservative final fair value range of $41–$50 emerges. Compared to the current price of $30.26, this suggests a potential upside of approximately 50%, leading to a final verdict that the stock is undervalued.

Future Risks

  • LKQ's biggest long-term threat is the auto industry's shift to electric vehicles (EVs), which require fewer of the mechanical parts that form the core of its business. In the shorter term, the company faces intense competition from online retailers and other large distributors, putting pressure on its profitability. Furthermore, as a company that has grown through acquisitions, higher interest rates could make future deals more expensive and difficult. Investors should closely watch the pace of EV adoption and LKQ's ability to protect its profit margins in a highly competitive market.

Wisdom of Top Value Investors

Bill Ackman

Bill Ackman would view LKQ Corporation in 2025 as a classic activist target: a large, durable business trading at a discount due to subpar, but fixable, operational metrics. Ackman's thesis would focus on the significant gap between LKQ's performance and that of best-in-class peers; for example, LKQ's operating margin of ~9% and Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of ~10% are less than half of what leaders like O'Reilly achieve. He would be attracted to its strong free cash flow and manageable leverage of around 2.5x Net Debt/EBITDA, seeing a clear opportunity to unlock value by driving margin improvement in its European segment and optimizing capital allocation. The primary risk is the execution complexity of its global operations and whether management can deliver on efficiency promises. For retail investors, Ackman would see this not as a high-quality compounder today, but as a compelling value play with a clear catalyst path to higher earnings and a re-rated stock price. If forced to choose the best stocks in the sector, Ackman would admire O'Reilly (ORLY) for its >40% ROIC as the definition of quality, praise AutoZone (AZO) for its disciplined buybacks, but would likely invest in LKQ (LKQ) because its lower 13-15x P/E offers a better entry point for a potential turnaround. A sustained improvement in operating margins toward 12% would solidify his conviction and likely trigger an investment.

Warren Buffett

Warren Buffett would view LKQ Corporation as a large, understandable, and durable business operating in the resilient automotive aftermarket. The company's vast distribution network creates a decent competitive moat, particularly in serving professional repair shops that need parts quickly. However, Buffett would be concerned by the company's financial performance, specifically its return on invested capital (ROIC) of around 10% and operating margins of 9%, which are respectable but significantly lag best-in-class peers like O'Reilly and AutoZone. These figures suggest that while LKQ has scale, it lacks the superior pricing power and efficiency of a truly wonderful business. The valuation, with a forward P/E ratio around 13-15x, is appealingly low and offers a margin of safety, but it reflects these lower returns.

Buffett's investment thesis in the auto parts industry is to own a business that benefits from the non-discretionary need to repair an aging fleet of vehicles, with a strong moat that allows for high returns on capital. LKQ's moat is good, but its returns are not great. The company's leverage, with Net Debt-to-EBITDA around 2.5x, is manageable but higher than he would prefer for a business without stellar profitability. Management's use of cash for share buybacks and debt reduction is sensible, as these actions can build per-share value, especially when the stock is inexpensive. Unlike Genuine Parts Company, which pays a consistent dividend, LKQ focuses on reinvesting and repurchasing shares, which can be more effective if done at the right price.

Ultimately, Buffett would likely avoid investing in LKQ at its current valuation. He would see it as a good, not great, company whose cheap price is not quite cheap enough to compensate for its mediocre profitability compared to superior alternatives. If forced to choose the best stocks in this sector, Buffett would prefer O'Reilly (ORLY) and AutoZone (AZO) for their incredible profitability (>40% ROIC) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC) for its stability, dividend history, and better-than-LKQ returns (~14% ROIC). Buffett's decision on LKQ could change if the price were to fall significantly, offering a much larger margin of safety, or if management demonstrated a clear path to sustainably improving ROIC into the mid-teens.

Charlie Munger

Charlie Munger would view LKQ Corporation as a large, durable, and necessary enterprise, but ultimately a second-tier business in the automotive aftermarket. He would appreciate its scale and the defensible niche it occupies in the recycled parts market, recognizing these as tangible competitive advantages. However, Munger would be fundamentally unimpressed by its financial returns, specifically its Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) of around 10% and operating margins of 9%. For Munger, these figures indicate a good, but not great, business that requires significant capital to generate merely adequate profits, a stark contrast to the exceptional 40%+ ROIC of peers like AutoZone or O'Reilly. Although the stock trades at a lower valuation with a forward P/E of 13-15x, he would see this not as a bargain, but as a fair price for a fair business, and Munger prefers to buy wonderful businesses at fair prices. The takeaway for retail investors is that while LKQ is a solid and stable company, it lacks the exceptional profitability and economic characteristics that define a true Munger-style compounder. If forced to choose the best stocks in this sector, Munger would point to O'Reilly (ORLY) and AutoZone (AZO) for their phenomenal ROICs above 40%, and Genuine Parts Company (GPC) for its higher-quality 14% ROIC and stronger brand within the distributor model. Munger would only consider LKQ if its price fell dramatically, creating a wide margin of safety to compensate for its mediocre returns.

Competition

LKQ Corporation's competitive standing is fundamentally different from its main rivals due to its highly diversified business model. Unlike competitors such as AutoZone or O'Reilly, which primarily focus on the distribution and retail of new aftermarket parts in North America, LKQ operates across several distinct segments. These include wholesale distribution in both North America and Europe, a large self-service salvage yard business that provides recycled original equipment (OE) parts, and a specialty segment through Keystone Automotive. This unique blend of services allows LKQ to be a one-stop-shop for many professional repairers, offering new, recycled, and remanufactured parts, which is a significant differentiator.

This diversification, however, is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it provides multiple revenue streams and a broad market reach, insulating the company from weakness in any single segment or geography. Its extensive European footprint, for example, gives it exposure to a market its main U.S. competitors have not penetrated. On the other hand, managing such a complex global enterprise presents significant operational challenges. Integrating numerous acquisitions and running businesses with different margin profiles, like lower-margin salvage and higher-margin specialty parts, can depress overall profitability metrics compared to more streamlined competitors. The complexity can also make the business harder for investors to understand and value.

Furthermore, LKQ's strategic focus is heavily weighted towards the professional installer, or the 'Do-It-For-Me' (DIFM) market. While this is a large and stable market, it means LKQ has less brand recognition with the average consumer compared to retail-focused peers. Its competitive advantage lies in logistics, parts availability across different categories, and its ability to service large commercial accounts. In contrast, competitors like AutoZone have built powerful brands and retail networks catering to the 'Do-It-Yourself' (DIY) customer, a segment where LKQ is less active. This positions LKQ as more of a B2B industrial distributor than a B2C retailer, with its success tied to the health of independent repair shops and collision centers.

Ultimately, LKQ competes on breadth and scale rather than on the pure operational efficiency and high-margin retail focus of its top-tier peers. Its strategy relies on leveraging its vast network to provide unparalleled parts availability to professional customers. The key for investors is whether LKQ can successfully streamline its global operations and improve its margins to a level that more closely rivals the industry leaders, thereby unlocking the value inherent in its diversified and market-leading positions in various niches.

  • Genuine Parts Company

    GPC • NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

    Genuine Parts Company (GPC), the parent of NAPA Auto Parts, presents a close parallel to LKQ due to its diversified business model, which includes both automotive and industrial parts distribution. Both companies have a significant global footprint and a strong focus on the professional installer market. However, GPC's NAPA brand gives it a stronger retail and brand presence in North America than LKQ. Financially, GPC has historically delivered more consistent dividend growth, while LKQ has focused more on acquisitions and debt reduction. The primary distinction lies in their non-automotive segments: LKQ is in salvage and specialty, while GPC is in industrial parts, making them both diversified but in different ways.

    In Business & Moat, GPC holds a slight edge. For brand, GPC's NAPA is a top-tier retail and professional brand in the U.S. (6,000+ stores), while LKQ's brand is strong with professionals but lacks consumer recognition. For switching costs, both are similar, building loyalty with professional clients through service and parts availability (commercial sales are >80% for both). For scale, both are giants with massive distribution networks, but GPC's combined automotive and industrial revenue is larger ($23B vs. LKQ's $14B). For network effects, both benefit from dense distribution networks making parts delivery faster. LKQ has a unique moat in regulatory barriers with its salvage operations, which require extensive licensing. Overall, GPC's stronger brand and slightly larger scale give it the win. Winner: Genuine Parts Company.

    In a Financial Statement Analysis, GPC demonstrates more resilience. For revenue growth, both are in the low-to-mid single digits, with LKQ recently showing slightly higher organic growth. GPC's margins are similar to LKQ's, with operating margins for both hovering around 9%, well below peers like AutoZone. GPC's profitability, measured by Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), is slightly better at ~14% versus LKQ's ~10%, showing more efficient use of capital. On the balance sheet, GPC maintains lower leverage with a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio of around 2.0x compared to LKQ's ~2.5x. Both generate strong free cash flow, but GPC has a long history of dividend payments, making it a dividend aristocrat. GPC's superior capital efficiency and stronger balance sheet make it the victor here. Winner: Genuine Parts Company.

    For Past Performance, GPC has been a more stable performer. Over the last five years, GPC's revenue CAGR has been around 6%, comparable to LKQ's. However, GPC's margin trend has been more stable, whereas LKQ's has been subject to more volatility from acquisitions and restructuring. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), performance has been similar over a five-year horizon, though both have lagged the market leaders. For risk, GPC is generally considered lower risk due to its dividend history and more conservative balance sheet, reflected in a slightly lower stock beta. GPC's stability and consistent returns to shareholders give it the edge. Winner: Genuine Parts Company.

    Looking at Future Growth, the comparison is more balanced. LKQ's revenue opportunities may be slightly greater due to its position in the European market, which is highly fragmented and ripe for consolidation. LKQ is also well-positioned to benefit from the growing complexity of cars, increasing the value of recycled OEM parts. GPC's growth will likely come from expanding its NAPA network and bolt-on acquisitions in its industrial segment. Both companies are focused on cost efficiency programs to improve margins. Analyst consensus for next-year EPS growth is in the mid-single digits for both. LKQ's edge in fragmented markets gives it a slight advantage. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    In terms of Fair Value, LKQ often trades at a discount. LKQ's Forward P/E ratio is typically around 13-15x, while GPC's is slightly higher at 15-17x. The same trend holds for EV/EBITDA, where LKQ is usually cheaper. GPC offers a superior dividend yield of around 2.5%, while LKQ does not currently pay a dividend, instead prioritizing share buybacks. The quality vs. price trade-off is clear: GPC commands a premium for its stability and dividend, while LKQ is priced as a value stock reflecting its higher operational complexity and lower margins. For an investor seeking a lower entry point, LKQ appears to be the better value today. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Winner: Genuine Parts Company over LKQ Corporation. GPC earns the verdict due to its superior financial stability, stronger brand recognition through NAPA, and a long-standing history of shareholder returns via dividends. While LKQ offers a compelling growth story in Europe and a unique position in the salvage market, its lower profitability (~10% ROIC vs. GPC's ~14%) and higher leverage (~2.5x vs. GPC's ~2.0x Net Debt/EBITDA) make it a riskier investment. GPC's proven ability to manage a diversified business while consistently rewarding shareholders provides a more reliable investment case. This makes GPC the more compelling choice for investors prioritizing stability and income.

  • AutoZone, Inc.

    AZO • NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

    AutoZone is a titan in the automotive aftermarket, primarily focused on the U.S. Do-It-Yourself (DIY) retail customer, though it has a rapidly growing professional (DIFM) business. This focus contrasts sharply with LKQ's B2B, wholesale, and salvage-oriented model. AutoZone is renowned for its exceptional operational efficiency, high profit margins, and aggressive share buyback program. While LKQ competes on the breadth of its offerings and global reach, AutoZone competes on retail excellence, brand strength, and financial discipline within a more concentrated North American market. A comparison highlights a classic strategic trade-off: LKQ's diversified scale versus AutoZone's focused profitability.

    In Business & Moat, AutoZone is the clear leader. Its brand is arguably the strongest in the U.S. auto parts retail sector, built over decades with a massive retail footprint (6,300+ U.S. stores). Switching costs are low in DIY, but AutoZone builds loyalty through customer service and its rewards program. Its DIFM business builds stickiness with commercial clients. For scale, its purchasing power is immense, allowing it to offer competitive pricing, especially on its high-margin private label brands like Duralast. Its network effect comes from its dense store network, enabling rapid parts availability for both DIY and commercial customers. LKQ's moat is in its salvage network and European scale, which is distinct. However, AutoZone's brand and retail dominance in the world's largest aftermarket are superior. Winner: AutoZone, Inc..

    A Financial Statement Analysis reveals AutoZone's superior efficiency. AutoZone's revenue growth is consistently in the mid-to-high single digits. The key difference is margins: AutoZone's operating margin is elite, consistently around 20%, more than double LKQ's ~9%. This translates into phenomenal profitability, with a Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) often exceeding 40%, compared to LKQ's ~10%. This shows AutoZone generates far more profit for every dollar invested in the business. Both companies use significant leverage, with Net Debt/EBITDA ratios around 2.5x, but AutoZone's massive cash generation makes its debt more manageable. AutoZone is a financial powerhouse. Winner: AutoZone, Inc..

    Looking at Past Performance, AutoZone has been an exceptional long-term investment. Its 5-year revenue CAGR of around 9% has outpaced LKQ's. More impressively, its disciplined cost control has led to a stable or improving margin trend. This financial performance has fueled incredible Total Shareholder Return (TSR), driven by relentless share repurchases that have significantly reduced its share count over time. In terms of risk, AutoZone's business is highly resilient in economic downturns as people repair older cars. While its stock can be volatile, its operational track record is one of the best in retail. It has simply executed better for longer. Winner: AutoZone, Inc..

    For Future Growth, the picture is more competitive. AutoZone's growth will come from expanding its DIFM business, opening mega-hubs to improve parts availability, and international expansion in Mexico and Brazil. However, its core U.S. DIY market is mature. LKQ, by contrast, has more white space for growth opportunities through European consolidation and leveraging its unique salvage and remanufacturing capabilities for complex future vehicles, like EVs. Analyst EPS growth forecasts are often higher for AutoZone due to buybacks, but LKQ's top-line potential may be greater. LKQ's exposure to less mature markets and unique segments gives it a slight edge in top-line potential. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    In terms of Fair Value, AutoZone consistently trades at a premium, which is justified by its quality. Its Forward P/E ratio is typically in the 18-20x range, higher than LKQ's 13-15x. Its EV/EBITDA multiple is also significantly higher. Neither company pays a dividend, both preferring to return capital via buybacks. The quality vs. price analysis shows AutoZone is a premium-priced, high-quality compounder, while LKQ is a value-priced company with a more complex story. For an investor willing to pay for best-in-class execution and returns, AutoZone is worth its premium. However, on pure metrics, LKQ is cheaper. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Winner: AutoZone, Inc. over LKQ Corporation. AutoZone is the decisive winner based on its vastly superior profitability, operational efficiency, and a proven track record of creating shareholder value. Its operating margins of ~20% and ROIC of >40% are in a different league from LKQ's single-digit margins and ~10% ROIC. While LKQ offers broader diversification and a potentially longer runway for geographic growth, it has not demonstrated the ability to convert that scale into the kind of profits AutoZone generates consistently. AutoZone's focused business model and relentless execution make it a higher-quality investment, justifying its premium valuation.

  • O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

    ORLY • NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET

    O'Reilly Automotive stands as a premier operator in the automotive aftermarket, excelling with a balanced business model that effectively serves both DIY and professional customers. Like AutoZone, O'Reilly is known for its stellar operational execution, consistent growth, and high profitability, setting a high bar for the industry. Its dual-market strategy provides a more direct comparison to LKQ's professional focus than a DIY-heavy peer. However, O'Reilly's operations are concentrated in North America, contrasting with LKQ's significant international presence. The comparison pits O'Reilly's best-in-class domestic operations against LKQ's global, diversified, but lower-margin model.

    For Business & Moat, O'Reilly is exceptionally strong. Its brand is highly respected by both DIYers and professionals, supported by a vast store network (6,000+ locations). Its switching costs for professional customers are built on superior service, including rapid delivery from its hub-and-spoke distribution system. O'Reilly's scale and logistics are a key advantage, often cited as the best in the industry for parts availability and delivery speed. This logistical prowess creates a powerful network effect, where more stores and distribution centers lead to better service, attracting more professional customers. While LKQ has a unique moat in salvage, O'Reilly's operational moat in distribution is arguably more potent and profitable. Winner: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc..

    In a Financial Statement Analysis, O'Reilly demonstrates elite performance. It has consistently delivered high-single-digit to low-double-digit revenue growth. Its key strength is its margins, with operating margins consistently above 20%, more than double LKQ's ~9%. This drives exceptional profitability, with ROIC regularly exceeding 40%, dwarfing LKQ's ~10%. This indicates an incredibly efficient use of capital. O'Reilly manages its balance sheet effectively, with a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio typically around 2.0x-2.5x, supported by massive free cash flow. O'Reilly's financial profile is a model of efficiency and high returns. Winner: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc..

    Regarding Past Performance, O'Reilly has been a top-tier performer for over a decade. Its 5-year revenue CAGR of over 10% is at the top of the industry. Its margin trend has been remarkably stable and strong, showcasing its pricing power and cost control. This has translated into phenomenal Total Shareholder Return (TSR), significantly outperforming LKQ and most of the market over the long term, fueled by both earnings growth and share buybacks. On risk, O'Reilly has proven to be highly resilient through economic cycles, and its operational consistency is a major de-risking factor. Its history of execution is nearly flawless. Winner: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc..

    In Future Growth, O'Reilly continues to have a solid runway. Its primary revenue opportunities lie in gaining market share in the professional segment, expanding its store footprint in the U.S., and growing its smaller international presence in Mexico. Its focus on superior parts availability and service continues to win over professional customers. LKQ's growth drivers are different, centered on European M&A and leveraging its multi-faceted parts offerings. While LKQ may have more 'blue sky' potential in untapped markets, O'Reilly's path to growth is clearer and lower risk. Analyst EPS growth expectations for O'Reilly remain robust, powered by steady sales growth and buybacks. Winner: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc..

    In Fair Value, O'Reilly commands a significant premium for its best-in-class status. Its Forward P/E ratio is often in the 23-25x range, substantially higher than LKQ's 13-15x. A similar premium is seen in its EV/EBITDA multiple. Like AutoZone, O'Reilly does not pay a dividend, preferring share repurchases. The quality vs. price trade-off is stark: O'Reilly is expensive because it is one of the highest-quality, most consistent growth companies in the entire consumer sector. LKQ is the 'value' alternative. For an investor looking for a bargain, LKQ is the obvious choice based on multiples alone. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Winner: O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. over LKQ Corporation. O'Reilly is the clear winner due to its superior operational excellence, unmatched profitability, and consistent long-term shareholder value creation. Its dual-market strategy is executed to near perfection, resulting in industry-leading operating margins (>20%) and ROIC (>40%) that LKQ, with its ~9% margin and ~10% ROIC, cannot match. While LKQ's global diversification and salvage operations provide a unique business model, O'Reilly's focused and flawless execution in the lucrative North American market has created a more profitable and financially sound company. The significant premium in O'Reilly's valuation is a direct reflection of its best-in-class status.

  • Advance Auto Parts, Inc.

    AAP • NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE

    Advance Auto Parts (AAP) is one of the largest automotive aftermarket parts providers in North America, with a business model that, like O'Reilly's, aims to serve both DIY and professional customers. However, AAP has struggled for years with operational challenges, including supply chain inefficiencies and integrating the General Parts International (Carquest) acquisition. This has resulted in financial performance that significantly lags peers like AutoZone and O'Reilly. A comparison with LKQ is interesting because both companies have faced complex integration challenges, but LKQ has managed its global acquisitions with more stable results, whereas AAP's struggles are more domestically focused and severe.

    In Business & Moat, AAP is in a weaker position. Its brand, which includes both Advance and Carquest, is well-known but has suffered from inconsistent execution, eroding some of its strength with professional customers. For switching costs, AAP has struggled to maintain loyalty with professionals due to inconsistent parts availability. In terms of scale, its revenue base (~$11B) is large but smaller than LKQ's (~$14B), and it has failed to effectively leverage that scale into profits. Its network effect is theoretically strong due to its large store count (~5,000 locations), but supply chain issues have hampered its effectiveness. Compared to LKQ's solid footing in its chosen markets, AAP's moat has proven to be less durable. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Financial Statement Analysis clearly shows AAP's difficulties. AAP's revenue growth has been flat to low-single-digits, trailing the industry. Its margins are a significant weakness, with operating margins collapsing to the low-single-digits (~4%), far below LKQ's stable ~9%. This has crushed its profitability, with ROIC falling to the mid-single-digits, well under LKQ's ~10%. AAP's balance sheet has also become stressed, with leverage rising to a high ~4.0x Net Debt/EBITDA following performance declines. It was forced to dramatically cut its dividend to preserve cash. LKQ's financial position is substantially healthier and more stable. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    An analysis of Past Performance highlights a prolonged period of underperformance for AAP. Its 5-year revenue CAGR has been weak, and its margin trend has been negative, with significant deterioration in the last two years. This has led to a disastrous Total Shareholder Return (TSR), with the stock price falling dramatically. From a risk perspective, AAP is currently one of the highest-risk stocks in the sector, as it is in the midst of a difficult and uncertain turnaround effort. LKQ's performance, while not market-leading, has been far more stable and predictable. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    For Future Growth, AAP's story is entirely about a potential turnaround. The company has new leadership attempting to fix its core operational problems, particularly in the supply chain. If successful, there is significant room for margin improvement and earnings recovery. This represents a high-risk, high-reward opportunity. LKQ's growth path is more defined, focused on steady market share gains and operational efficiencies. Analyst EPS forecasts for AAP are highly uncertain. While AAP has more upside from a low base if the turnaround works, LKQ's growth is far more probable and lower risk. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    From a Fair Value perspective, AAP trades at a depressed valuation reflecting its operational distress. Its Forward P/E ratio is volatile but generally in the 15x range, which seems high for a company with its issues but reflects hope for an earnings recovery. Its EV/EBITDA multiple is lower than LKQ's. The quality vs. price trade-off shows AAP is a 'deep value' or 'turnaround' play. It is cheap for a reason. LKQ, while also a value stock, is of much higher quality and financial stability. LKQ offers better risk-adjusted value today. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Winner: LKQ Corporation over Advance Auto Parts, Inc. LKQ is the decisive winner in this comparison, as it is a more stable, profitable, and financially sound company. While both have faced integration challenges, LKQ has managed its complexity far better, maintaining consistent operating margins around 9% and a reasonable leverage profile. In contrast, AAP has seen its operating margins collapse to ~4%, its leverage spike to ~4.0x, and its stock price plummet. AAP is a high-risk turnaround story, whereas LKQ is a stable, global leader. For nearly every metric, from profitability and balance sheet health to past performance and risk, LKQ is the superior investment.

  • Dorman Products, Inc.

    DORM • NASDAQ GLOBAL SELECT MARKET

    Dorman Products occupies a different niche in the automotive aftermarket value chain. Unlike LKQ, which is primarily a distributor, Dorman is a supplier and designer of original equipment 'dealer exclusive' parts. It identifies common failure points on vehicles and engineers aftermarket solutions, often improving on the original design. This makes it a key supplier to distributors like LKQ, AutoZone, and O'Reilly. The comparison is one of a value-added supplier versus a scaled distributor. Dorman's success hinges on innovation and engineering, while LKQ's success depends on logistics and network scale.

    In Business & Moat, Dorman has a unique and defensible position. Its brand is highly respected among professional technicians for providing solutions to difficult repair problems. Its primary moat comes from its intellectual property and engineering expertise—a form of specialized know-how. It has a portfolio of tens of thousands of unique SKUs, creating high switching costs for distributors who rely on its comprehensive catalog. Its scale is smaller than LKQ's (~$1.8B revenue vs. LKQ's $14B), but it is a leader in its specific niche. LKQ's moat is in its logistical network. Dorman's is in its product development pipeline. Both are strong, but Dorman's innovation-driven moat is harder to replicate. Winner: Dorman Products, Inc..

    In a Financial Statement Analysis, the two companies have surprisingly similar profiles. Dorman's revenue growth has been robust, often outpacing the broader market due to its constant introduction of new products. Its operating margins have historically been strong, in the low double-digits, but have recently compressed to around 9%, very similar to LKQ's. Its profitability (ROIC) is also comparable to LKQ's, typically in the ~10% range. Dorman operates with very low leverage, with a Net Debt/EBITDA ratio usually below 1.5x, making its balance sheet more conservative than LKQ's ~2.5x. Both generate healthy free cash flow. Dorman's stronger balance sheet gives it the financial edge. Winner: Dorman Products, Inc..

    For Past Performance, Dorman has a strong record of growth. Its 5-year revenue CAGR has often been in the high single or low double digits, faster than LKQ's, driven by its 'new product machine'. Its margin trend has seen some compression recently due to inflation and supply chain costs, similar to many in the industry. In terms of Total Shareholder Return (TSR), Dorman's performance has been solid, though it can be more volatile than a large distributor. For risk, Dorman's reliance on a handful of large distributor customers (including LKQ) creates concentration risk, but its conservative balance sheet mitigates this. LKQ is more diversified but carries more debt. The performance is fairly balanced. Winner: Tie.

    Looking at Future Growth, Dorman is well-positioned. The increasing complexity of vehicles creates more opportunities for it to engineer new, high-margin replacement parts. Its revenue opportunities are tied to its R&D pipeline and its ability to continue identifying failure-prone OE parts. It is also expanding into heavy-duty and international markets. LKQ's growth is more tied to M&A and logistical efficiencies. Analyst EPS growth forecasts for Dorman are generally positive, linked to its product innovation cycle. Dorman's asset-light, innovation-led model gives it a strong organic growth algorithm. Winner: Dorman Products, Inc..

    In terms of Fair Value, Dorman typically trades at a premium to LKQ. Its Forward P/E ratio is often in the 18-20x range, compared to LKQ's 13-15x. This reflects the market's appreciation for its unique business model and growth prospects. Its EV/EBITDA multiple is also higher. The quality vs. price view suggests Dorman is a higher-quality, niche growth company that commands a premium valuation, while LKQ is a scaled, value-priced distributor. Given Dorman's superior balance sheet and organic growth drivers, its premium can be justified, but LKQ is undeniably cheaper on the surface. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Winner: Dorman Products, Inc. over LKQ Corporation. Dorman wins this matchup due to its unique, innovation-driven business model, more conservative balance sheet, and strong organic growth profile. While LKQ is a logistics behemoth, Dorman has carved out a highly defensible and profitable niche by focusing on engineering value-added products. This results in a business with a clearer growth path and less balance sheet risk (Net Debt/EBITDA <1.5x vs. LKQ's ~2.5x). Although LKQ is cheaper, Dorman's higher-quality earnings stream and leadership in a specialized segment make it a more attractive long-term investment, justifying its premium valuation.

  • RockAuto, LLC

    RockAuto is a private, e-commerce-focused automotive parts retailer that has become a major disruptive force in the industry, particularly for the DIY segment. It operates a pure-play online model with no physical stores, allowing it to offer a vast selection of parts at highly competitive prices. This contrasts directly with LKQ's model, which is built on a physical distribution network primarily serving professional installers. A comparison between the two highlights the ongoing battle between traditional distribution and disruptive e-commerce. RockAuto competes on price and selection, while LKQ competes on service, immediacy, and relationships for its professional customer base.

    In Business & Moat, the two have fundamentally different strengths. RockAuto's brand is exceptionally strong among car enthusiasts and price-sensitive DIYers. Its moat is its low-cost structure and a network effect derived from its massive online catalog, which aggregates inventory from hundreds of manufacturers. This creates a go-to destination for hard-to-find parts. However, its switching costs are zero. LKQ's moat is its physical logistics network, which provides rapid local delivery to professional installers—a service RockAuto cannot match. For professionals who need a part in hours, not days, LKQ's network is indispensable. LKQ also has regulatory barriers in its salvage business. LKQ's moat in the professional channel is more durable against online competition. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    Because RockAuto is a private company, a detailed Financial Statement Analysis is impossible. However, based on its business model, we can infer certain characteristics. Its revenue growth has likely been very high, capturing significant market share online. Its margins are probably thin on a gross basis due to its low-price strategy, but its lean operating model (no stores, centralized warehousing) should lead to respectable operating margins. It likely has low capital intensity and generates strong cash flow. LKQ, by contrast, has massive investments in real estate, inventory, and vehicle fleets, leading to lower asset turnover and returns on capital. Without concrete numbers, this is speculative, but RockAuto's model is designed for capital efficiency. Winner: Unknown (likely RockAuto on efficiency metrics).

    For Past Performance, RockAuto's growth has almost certainly outpaced LKQ's over the last decade, as it has been a primary beneficiary of the shift to online parts purchasing. Its market share gains represent a direct threat to the DIY business of all traditional retailers. LKQ's performance has been driven more by acquisitions in slower-growing markets. From a risk perspective, RockAuto faces intense online competition (including from Amazon) and is vulnerable to shipping cost inflation. LKQ's risk is tied to economic cycles affecting collision and repair rates and the complexity of integrating its acquisitions. Based on its disruptive impact and market share gains, RockAuto has had a stronger performance trajectory. Winner: RockAuto, LLC.

    Looking at Future Growth, RockAuto will continue to be a major force. Its revenue opportunities involve further penetration of the DIY market and potentially making inroads with smaller professional installers who are price-sensitive and can wait for parts. However, it faces a ceiling in the professional market due to the need for immediate delivery. LKQ's growth is tied to European consolidation and enhancing its service to large professional accounts. A key future battle will be over the digital interface with repair shops. LKQ and its peers are investing heavily in B2B online ordering platforms to counter the threat from players like RockAuto. LKQ's incumbency with professionals gives it an edge in the largest part of the market. Winner: LKQ Corporation.

    From a Fair Value perspective, valuation is not applicable as RockAuto is private. However, we can analyze the strategic value. The existence of RockAuto places a ceiling on the pricing power and margins of any company serving the DIY channel. It forces traditional players to be more competitive. LKQ is somewhat insulated because its core professional customers prioritize speed and service over pure price. A public RockAuto would likely command a high valuation multiple typical of a disruptive e-commerce leader. LKQ's current valuation reflects its mature, lower-margin profile. Winner: Not Applicable.

    Winner: LKQ Corporation over RockAuto, LLC. While RockAuto is a formidable and disruptive competitor, LKQ wins this head-to-head comparison because its business model is focused on and better defended within the professional (DIFM) market, which represents the majority of the aftermarket industry. RockAuto's 'price and selection' model is powerful but struggles to meet the immediate delivery and service needs of professional repair shops, where labor costs make waiting for a part prohibitively expensive. LKQ's extensive physical network of distribution centers and delivery vehicles creates a durable moat for serving this customer base. RockAuto has won a significant battle in the DIY space, but LKQ is better positioned to win the larger, more lucrative professional war.

Top Similar Companies

Based on industry classification and performance score:

AutoZone, Inc.

AZO • NYSE
23/25

O’Reilly Automotive, Inc.

ORLY • NASDAQ
20/25

Genuine Parts Company

GPC • NYSE
18/25

Detailed Analysis

Does LKQ Corporation Have a Strong Business Model and Competitive Moat?

4/5

LKQ Corporation has built a strong competitive moat based on its massive global scale in sourcing and distributing automotive parts. The company's unique business model, which combines recycled original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts, aftermarket parts, and specialty products, creates a powerful one-stop-shop for its professional mechanic customer base. Its vast distribution network in North America and Europe is a significant barrier to entry for competitors. While the business is capital-intensive and less focused on high-margin private label brands than some retail peers, its procurement power and logistics are top-tier. The investor takeaway is positive, reflecting a resilient business with durable competitive advantages in its core markets.

  • Service to Professional Mechanics

    Pass

    LKQ's entire business model is fundamentally built to serve the commercial 'Do-It-For-Me' (DIFM) market, making its penetration in this segment an absolute core strength rather than just one part of its business.

    Unlike retailers who report commercial sales as a percentage of their total, LKQ's business is inherently commercial. Its wholesale operations in North America ($5.76 billion) and Europe ($6.41 billion) are almost exclusively targeted at professional repair and collision shops. This singular focus allows LKQ to optimize its entire operation—from inventory and logistics to sales and credit terms—for the needs of business customers. This contrasts with competitors who must balance the needs of both DIY and DIFM customers. The company's market leadership in the alternative parts distribution space is direct evidence of its deep penetration and success within the commercial segment. Because the DIFM market is the foundation of its business and not just an add-on, it easily earns a 'Pass'.

  • Strength Of In-House Brands

    Fail

    LKQ's competitive advantage comes from its broad distribution and unique mix of parts, not from the strength of a single, high-margin private label brand like its retail-focused peers.

    While LKQ does have its own private label aftermarket brands, such as Keystone, its business model does not rely on them to the same extent as retailers like AutoZone (Duralast) or O'Reilly (MasterPro). LKQ's strategy is to be a comprehensive distributor, offering customers a wide choice that includes its private brands, national brands, and its unique recycled OEM parts. The company does not disclose private label sales as a percentage of revenue, but its identity is that of a distributor, not a brand owner. Therefore, its moat is built on logistics and procurement scale rather than brand loyalty to an in-house product. Because private label strength is not a primary driver of its competitive advantage compared to best-in-class retailers, this factor receives a 'Fail' on a conservative basis.

  • Store And Warehouse Network Reach

    Pass

    With over 1,600 locations globally, LKQ's massive and dense distribution network creates a formidable barrier to entry, enabling the rapid parts delivery that is critical to its professional customers.

    In the automotive repair business, time is money. LKQ's extensive physical footprint of distribution centers, salvage yards, and branch locations is a core asset designed to minimize vehicle downtime for its customers. This network allows for multiple daily deliveries to most professional shops in its service areas, a logistical capability that is crucial for winning and retaining commercial accounts. Building a network of this scale would require billions of dollars in capital and years of complex integration, making it a durable competitive advantage. While specific metrics like average delivery time are not publicly available, the company's continued growth and market share demonstrate the effectiveness of its logistics infrastructure. This hard-to-replicate asset is a clear strength, warranting a 'Pass'.

  • Purchasing Power Over Suppliers

    Pass

    With annual revenue exceeding `$14 billion`, LKQ possesses immense purchasing power that gives it a significant cost advantage over smaller competitors in sourcing both new and recycled parts.

    Scale is arguably LKQ's most significant competitive advantage. As one of the largest purchasers of aftermarket parts globally, it can negotiate highly favorable pricing and terms from suppliers. This purchasing power is even more pronounced in the salvage market, where LKQ is a dominant force at auctions, allowing it to secure the raw materials for its recycled parts business at a low cost. This scale directly impacts its cost of goods sold and supports its gross profit margins, which are strong for a distributor. Its massive revenue base compared to smaller, regional players makes its cost structure difficult to compete with. This ability to out-buy the competition is a fundamental pillar of its moat and is a clear 'Pass'.

  • Parts Availability And Data Accuracy

    Pass

    LKQ's key advantage is its unparalleled parts catalog, which uniquely combines recycled OEM, new aftermarket, and specialty parts, creating a one-stop-shop that competitors cannot easily match.

    LKQ's strength is not just the quantity of SKUs it holds, but the diversity of its inventory. By procuring salvage vehicles, it gains access to a vast supply of recycled original equipment manufacturer (OEM) parts, which are often preferred by collision shops for their fit and quality. It layers this with a comprehensive offering of new aftermarket parts, providing a 'good, better, best' solution for its customers. While specific metrics like vehicle application coverage are not disclosed, the company's $13.72 billion in annual parts and services revenue is a testament to its catalog's breadth. This unique blend of inventory is a core part of its moat, as competitors focused solely on new aftermarket parts (like AutoZone or O'Reilly) cannot compete on the recycled OEM front. This comprehensive catalog makes LKQ an indispensable partner for many repair shops, justifying a 'Pass'.

How Strong Are LKQ Corporation's Financial Statements?

1/5

LKQ Corporation's recent financial statements show a company that is profitable and generates strong annual cash flow, with fiscal 2024 free cash flow reaching $810 million. However, there are signs of stress, including a significant debt load of $5.5 billion and declining operating margins, which fell from 9.38% annually to 8.23% in the latest quarter. The company actively returns cash to shareholders via dividends and buybacks, which appear sustainable for now. The investor takeaway is mixed; while the business is fundamentally cash-generative, the high leverage and weakening profitability present notable risks.

  • Inventory Turnover And Profitability

    Fail

    LKQ's inventory turnover is slow and has slightly worsened recently, indicating potential inefficiencies in managing its large stock of automotive parts, which ties up a significant amount of cash.

    The company's inventory management efficiency is a point of weakness. The inventory turnover ratio in the latest period was 2.67, a slight deterioration from the annual figure of 2.75. This means the company sells and replaces its entire inventory just 2.67 times per year. For a distribution and retail business, this rate is quite low and suggests that capital is tied up in inventory for long periods. As of the latest balance sheet, inventory stands at a massive $3.3 billion, representing over 21% of the company's total assets. While carrying a wide breadth of products is part of the business model, this slow turnover increases the risk of parts becoming obsolete and represents a major use of cash that could otherwise be used for debt reduction or investment.

  • Return On Invested Capital

    Fail

    The company's return on invested capital has recently declined and is at a low level, suggesting that management's investments in the business are not generating strong returns for shareholders.

    LKQ's effectiveness in capital allocation shows signs of weakness. Its return on capital (ROC) for the most recent period was 5.87%, a significant drop from the 7.18% achieved for the full fiscal year 2024. While industry benchmarks are not provided, a return below 8-10% is often considered subpar and may not exceed the company's weighted average cost of capital (WACC), meaning it might not be creating shareholder value from its investments. The company's capital expenditures for fiscal 2024 were $311 million, or about 2.2% of revenue, which seems like a reasonable level for maintenance and growth. However, the low and declining return on these investments is a primary concern.

  • Profitability From Product Mix

    Fail

    While the company maintains healthy gross margins, a recent and notable decline in its operating margin points to weakening cost control or pricing power, which is a concern for future profitability.

    LKQ's profitability is under pressure. Although its gross profit margin remains strong at 38.32% in the latest quarter, this is a slight decrease from the 39.19% reported for the full 2024 fiscal year. More concerning is the sharper drop in the operating profit margin, which fell from 9.38% annually to 8.23% in the last quarter. This indicates that operating expenses, such as selling, general, and administrative costs, are growing faster than gross profit. A declining operating margin is a red flag for investors as it signals that the core business is becoming less profitable, potentially due to competitive pressures or internal inefficiencies.

  • Managing Short-Term Finances

    Pass

    LKQ demonstrates effective management of its short-term finances, maintaining a healthy liquidity ratio and adeptly using supplier credit to fund its inventory needs.

    The company appears to manage its working capital effectively. As of the latest quarter, its current ratio was 1.6, providing a solid cushion of current assets to cover its current liabilities. This is a sign of healthy short-term liquidity. Furthermore, the annual cash flow statement for fiscal 2024 shows sophisticated management of its cash cycle; the company's increase in inventory (a $253 million use of cash) was almost perfectly matched by an increase in accounts payable (a $251 million source of cash). This demonstrates an ability to use favorable payment terms with suppliers to finance its operations, which frees up cash for other priorities.

  • Individual Store Financial Health

    Fail

    No data is provided on individual store performance, making it impossible to assess the financial health and efficiency of the company's core retail and distribution locations.

    An analysis of LKQ's individual store financial health cannot be performed due to a lack of specific data. Key performance indicators such as same-store sales growth, sales per square foot, or store-level operating margins are not disclosed in the high-level financial statements provided. This information is critical for understanding the performance of the company's fundamental operating units and for verifying that the business model is healthy at the ground level. Without these metrics, investors have a significant blind spot regarding the core drivers of revenue and profitability.

How Has LKQ Corporation Performed Historically?

2/5

LKQ Corporation's past performance presents a mixed picture. The company has been a reliable cash generator, producing over $800 million in free cash flow annually and aggressively returning capital to shareholders through consistent buybacks and a growing dividend initiated in 2021. However, this strength is offset by recent weakness in core profitability. After peaking in 2022 with an EPS of $4.15, earnings fell sharply to $2.62 by 2024, and operating margins have compressed. While revenue growth has been steady, the declining profitability and a recent increase in debt create a cautious takeaway for investors.

  • Long-Term Sales And Profit Growth

    Fail

    Revenue growth has been modest and steady, but earnings per share (EPS) growth has been volatile, peaking in 2022 and declining significantly in the last two years.

    LKQ's growth record is inconsistent. On the top line, revenue growth has been stable, with a five-year compound annual growth rate of approximately 5.4%. This indicates a mature business capable of steady expansion. However, the earnings picture is far more volatile. EPS showed impressive growth from $2.09 in FY2020 to a peak of $4.15 in FY2022, driven by strong margins. This momentum then reversed sharply, with EPS falling to $3.50 in FY2023 and $2.62 in FY2024, a 37% drop from its high. This lack of consistent earnings growth is a significant weakness and suggests the business is susceptible to cyclical pressures or competitive challenges that it has struggled to manage in recent years.

  • Consistent Growth From Existing Stores

    Fail

    Specific data on same-store sales is not provided, making it impossible to assess the company's organic growth from its existing operational footprint.

    The provided financial statements do not include metrics for same-store sales or organic revenue growth. For a company in the aftermarket retail and services industry, this is a critical performance indicator that helps investors understand if growth is coming from improved performance at existing locations or if it is primarily driven by acquisitions and new openings. Without this data, it is difficult to gauge the underlying health and customer demand within LKQ's core business. The absence of this key metric represents a significant gap in the historical analysis, preventing a definitive judgment on the consistency of its organic growth.

  • Profitability From Shareholder Equity

    Fail

    Return on Equity (ROE) has been solid but inconsistent, peaking at over `20%` in 2022 before falling sharply to `11.35%`, mirroring the company's volatile profitability.

    LKQ's ability to generate profit from shareholder investments has been choppy. The company's Return on Equity (ROE) improved significantly from 11.89% in FY2020 to an impressive 20.24% in FY2022, indicating highly effective management during that period. However, this high level of profitability was not sustained. ROE fell to 16.18% in FY2023 and then collapsed to 11.35% in FY2024, returning to levels seen five years prior. This decline was primarily driven by a fall in net profit margin, which even an increase in financial leverage (debt-to-equity rose from 0.72 to 0.93) could not offset. A history of inconsistent ROE signals that the company's competitive advantages may not be strong enough to deliver superior returns through an entire economic cycle.

  • Track Record Of Returning Capital

    Pass

    LKQ has a short but strong record of returning capital, initiating a rapidly growing dividend in 2021 and consistently buying back shares, which has reduced share count by over 13% in five years.

    LKQ has demonstrated a clear commitment to shareholder returns over the past several years. The company initiated its first dividend in FY2021 and has aggressively increased it each year, from an initial $0.25 per share to $1.20 in FY2024. In parallel, LKQ has been active with share repurchases, reducing its outstanding share count from 305 million in FY2020 to 264 million by FY2024. This combination of a growing dividend and a 1.64% buyback yield in FY2024 provides a significant total shareholder return. The dividend appears well-supported by cash flow, and the payout ratio of 46.09% is reasonable, suggesting room for future increases, provided that earnings stabilize. This consistent and multi-faceted approach to returning capital is a significant positive.

  • Consistent Cash Flow Generation

    Pass

    LKQ consistently generates strong free cash flow, averaging over `$1 billion` in the last five years, though the trend has been negative recently.

    The ability to generate cash is a hallmark of LKQ's past performance. Over the last five fiscal years, the company has produced substantial free cash flow (FCF) annually: $1,271M (2020), $1,074M (2021), $1,028M (2022), $998M (2023), and $810M (2024). This consistency is a major strength, as it provides the capital needed for dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, and debt service without relying on external financing. However, the clear downward trend is a point of concern, with FCF falling nearly 36% from its 2020 peak. The free cash flow to sales margin has also declined from a high of 10.93% to 5.64%. Despite the negative trend, the absolute level of cash generation remains robust and is a core pillar of the company's financial strength.

What Are LKQ Corporation's Future Growth Prospects?

3/5

LKQ Corporation's future growth outlook is mixed but leans positive, anchored by its dominant position in the professional automotive repair market. The company benefits from powerful tailwinds, including the increasing age and complexity of vehicles, which drives steady demand for its parts. However, growth is likely to be moderate, constrained by the maturity of its key markets and the cyclical nature of its specialty parts business. While LKQ's scale and unique recycled parts model provide a strong defense against competitors like GPC and O'Reilly, it faces challenges in digital transformation and the long-term transition to electric vehicles. For investors, the takeaway is that LKQ offers stable, resilient growth rather than explosive expansion.

  • Benefit From Aging Vehicle Population

    Pass

    The record-high average age of vehicles on the road provides a powerful and durable tailwind for LKQ, creating a constantly growing pool of cars that need the repair and maintenance parts it sells.

    The automotive aftermarket is fundamentally supported by the age of the vehicle fleet. With the average age of cars in the U.S. now exceeding 12.5 years and remaining high in Europe, there is a massive and sustained demand for repairs. Older vehicles are typically out of warranty and require more frequent and significant part replacements, directly benefiting LKQ's core business. This trend, driven by high new car prices and improved vehicle longevity, is not expected to reverse in the next 3-5 years. It provides a stable, non-discretionary source of demand that underpins the company's growth outlook, making it one of the most reliable positive factors for the company.

  • Online And Digital Sales Growth

    Fail

    While LKQ is investing in its digital platforms to better serve professional customers, its e-commerce capabilities are not as advanced or central to its strategy as those of leading competitors, representing a key area for improvement.

    The automotive aftermarket is increasingly moving towards digital and online ordering, even for professional customers who value efficiency. While LKQ offers online ordering portals, its digital presence and user experience are not considered industry-leading. Competitors with large retail and B2C operations have often invested more heavily in creating seamless, user-friendly e-commerce platforms that they are now leveraging for their professional customers. LKQ's growth in this channel is critical for retaining and attracting modern repair shops, but it appears to be catching up rather than leading the charge. Given the importance of digital channels for future growth, this represents a relative weakness.

  • New Store Openings And Modernization

    Fail

    LKQ's future growth is driven by optimizing its vast existing network and strategic acquisitions rather than a strategy based on a high rate of new organic location openings.

    Unlike retail-focused peers who grow by systematically adding new storefronts, LKQ's expansion strategy is different. With over 1,600 locations, its focus is primarily on enhancing the efficiency and density of its existing distribution network. Future growth in its physical footprint is more likely to come from acquiring smaller, regional distributors to fill gaps in its network, rather than building a large number of new facilities from the ground up. While this is a sound strategy for a B2B distributor, it doesn't align with the metric of aggressive new store openings as a primary growth lever. Therefore, based on the specific definition of this factor, it is not a key pillar of their forward-looking organic growth plan.

  • Growth In Professional Customer Sales

    Pass

    LKQ's business is fundamentally built to serve the professional DIFM market, and its future growth is directly tied to expanding its share through superior logistics and a unique parts offering.

    LKQ is a dominant force in the professional 'Do-It-For-Me' (DIFM) market, which is the core of its business, not just a segment. Its massive wholesale operations in North America ($5.76 billion) and Europe ($6.41 billion) are entirely geared towards serving professional repair and collision shops. The company's strategy is centered on providing unmatched parts availability and rapid delivery, which are the most critical factors for its commercial customers. Its unique combination of recycled OEM and new aftermarket parts creates a value proposition that is difficult for retail-focused competitors to replicate. This deep entrenchment and singular focus on the professional market is a clear strength and a primary engine for future growth.

  • Adding New Parts Categories

    Pass

    LKQ excels at expanding its product lines, particularly by leveraging its unique salvage operations to offer recycled high-tech components for newer vehicles, a key growth area as car complexity increases.

    LKQ's ability to grow by adding new product lines is a core strength. As vehicles become more complex with ADAS sensors, cameras, and electronic modules, the demand for affordable replacements grows. LKQ's salvage and recycling operations give it a unique and powerful advantage by providing a source of these expensive, complex OEM parts long before the aftermarket develops alternatives. This allows LKQ to serve repair needs on late-model vehicles that competitors cannot. This continuous expansion of its high-tech parts catalog, both recycled and new aftermarket, directly addresses the most significant trend in the industry and is a powerful driver of future growth.

Is LKQ Corporation Fairly Valued?

5/5

As of December 26, 2025, LKQ Corporation appears undervalued with its stock price of $30.26 trading in the lower third of its 52-week range. Key valuation metrics, such as its P/E ratio of ~11.2x and forward EV/EBITDA of ~7.9x, are below historical averages and significantly cheaper than higher-margin peers. Combined with a strong Free Cash Flow Yield over 10% and a dividend yield near 4.0%, the data suggests a mismatch between the current price and the company's cash-generating ability. The investor takeaway is positive, as the stock seems priced with a margin of safety, assuming the business maintains its stable performance.

  • Enterprise Value To EBITDA

    Pass

    The company's EV/EBITDA ratio of ~7.9x is significantly below its historical average and peer group, suggesting a cheap valuation even after accounting for its lower-margin business model.

    LKQ's Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA) multiple on a trailing twelve-month basis is 7.9x. This is substantially lower than its 5-year historical average of ~10.6x, indicating it is cheaper compared to its recent past. More importantly, it represents a steep discount to key peers like Genuine Parts Company (12.1x) and AutoZone (~16.6x). While some discount is justified by LKQ's lower operating margins and higher debt load (Debt-to-EBITDA of ~2.5x), the magnitude of the gap appears excessive. A lower EV/EBITDA is attractive because it means an investor is paying less for each dollar of the company's operating earnings. This factor passes because the current multiple suggests the market is overly pessimistic about LKQ's earnings power relative to both its own history and its competitors.

  • Total Yield To Shareholders

    Pass

    LKQ returns significant capital to shareholders through a combination of a ~4.0% dividend yield and a consistent share buyback program, resulting in a high total yield that signals management believes the stock is cheap.

    Total Shareholder Yield combines the dividend yield with the net buyback yield (the value of shares repurchased minus shares issued). LKQ currently has a dividend yield of nearly 4.0%. On top of this, the company has been actively repurchasing shares, causing its share count to decrease by 2.75% over the last year. This creates a net buyback yield of 2.75%. Combining these gives a Total Shareholder Yield of approximately 6.75%. This is a very strong rate of return to investors. This commitment is well-funded by the company's strong free cash flow and a payout ratio (including buybacks) that is manageable. Such a substantial return of capital often indicates that management views the stock as undervalued and that it is a better use of cash than reinvesting it all back into the business at potentially lower rates of return.

  • Free Cash Flow Yield

    Pass

    LKQ boasts a powerful Free Cash Flow (FCF) Yield of over 10%, indicating it generates a very high amount of cash relative to its stock price, a strong sign of undervaluation.

    Free Cash Flow (FCF) yield is a crucial metric that shows how much cash the business generates compared to its market value. Based on its trailing FCF of ~$810 million and a market cap of ~$7.75 billion, LKQ's FCF yield is ~10.5%. This is an exceptionally strong figure. The company's Price to Free Cash Flow (P/FCF) ratio is correspondingly low at ~10.7x. This high yield not only signals that the stock may be undervalued but also demonstrates that the company has ample cash to service its debt, invest in its business, and fund shareholder returns (dividends and buybacks) without financial strain. Analyst projections for future EPS growth in the mid-single digits suggest this cash flow is sustainable. The metric passes because a 10%+ FCF yield provides a significant margin of safety and a compelling cash-based return for investors at the current price.

  • Price-To-Earnings (P/E) Ratio

    Pass

    With a trailing P/E ratio of ~11.2x and a forward P/E of ~9.4x, the stock is trading well below its 5-year historical average and at a fraction of its peers' multiples, signaling it is cheap on an earnings basis.

    The Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratio shows how much investors are willing to pay for one dollar of a company's earnings. LKQ's trailing P/E (TTM) is 11.2x, and its forward P/E based on 2026 earnings estimates is even lower at ~9.4x. This is a clear discount to its own 5-year average P/E, which has been in the 12.4x-14.8x range. The valuation appears even more compelling when compared to peers like AutoZone (24.1x) and O'Reilly (~31.8x). While LKQ's lower growth and profitability justify a lower P/E, the current multiple is low even for a stable, moderate-growth business. The P/E to Growth (PEG) ratio is also favorable at approximately 0.9, which is often considered a sign of undervaluation. This factor passes because the P/E ratio is low on both an absolute and relative basis.

  • Price-To-Sales (P/S) Ratio

    Pass

    The stock's Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio of ~0.55x is low for its industry and suggests that its ~$14 billion in annual revenue is being undervalued by the market.

    The Price-to-Sales (P/S) ratio compares a company's stock price to its revenues, which can be useful for valuing companies with cyclical or temporarily depressed profits. LKQ's P/S ratio is ~0.55x. This is very low and implies that investors are paying only 55 cents for every dollar of the company's annual sales. While LKQ's gross margins of ~38-39% are lower than retail peers, they are stable and substantial, suggesting the company is effective at turning revenue into profit. A low P/S ratio can be a sign of undervaluation, especially when the company has a long history of profitability and cash generation. Given the stability of the auto repair industry and LKQ's significant revenue base, the current P/S ratio appears overly pessimistic and therefore passes this valuation check.

Detailed Future Risks

LKQ faces significant macroeconomic and competitive pressures that could impact its performance. The company's health is tied to consumer spending on vehicle maintenance, which can suffer during an economic downturn as people delay non-essential repairs. Persistent inflation also poses a risk by increasing the cost of parts, freight, and labor, potentially squeezing profit margins if these costs cannot be fully passed on to customers. The auto parts distribution industry is intensely competitive, with LKQ battling original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), large retail chains like AutoZone and O'Reilly, and nimble online players like RockAuto and Amazon. This constant competitive pressure limits pricing power and requires continuous investment to maintain market share.

The most profound long-term risk facing LKQ is the structural shift from internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to electric vehicles (EVs). EVs have far fewer moving parts and do not require many of the components central to LKQ's business, such as engines, transmissions, fuel systems, and exhausts. While demand for collision parts like bumpers and fenders will remain, the decline in mechanical repair parts represents a fundamental threat to the company's revenue model over the next decade. LKQ is exploring opportunities in the EV space, such as battery recycling and servicing, but this is a new and unproven market where the company has yet to establish a competitive advantage.

From a company-specific standpoint, LKQ's historical growth has been heavily dependent on a strategy of acquiring other companies. This approach carries inherent risks, including the challenge of successfully integrating new businesses and the danger of overpaying for assets. In a higher interest rate environment, this acquisition-led growth becomes more costly and difficult to execute, potentially slowing the company's expansion. The company also maintains a notable debt load, which stood at approximately $3.7 billion as of early 2024. While manageable, this leverage makes the company more vulnerable to interest rate hikes or a sudden drop in earnings, and it must dedicate a portion of its cash flow to servicing this debt rather than reinvesting in the business or returning it to shareholders.

Navigation

Click a section to jump

Current Price
33.20
52 Week Range
28.13 - 44.82
Market Cap
8.53B
EPS (Diluted TTM)
2.69
P/E Ratio
12.37
Forward P/E
10.54
Avg Volume (3M)
N/A
Day Volume
3,294,007
Total Revenue (TTM)
14.10B
Net Income (TTM)
697.00M
Annual Dividend
--
Dividend Yield
--